Autocalibration for Creating 2D/3D Displays on Complex Geometric Surfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Arnold K. [1 ]
Fieguth P. [2 ]
Dennison A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Vision and Image Processing Lab, University of Waterloo
[2] Systems Design Engineering Department, University of Waterloo
关键词
6;
D O I
10.1002/msid.1354
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Geometric calibration methods tend to rely on precalibrated cameras or real calibration targets. Here we explore the chal-lenge of achieving a sufficiently accurate projector system calibration for complex projection mapping tasks that can rely on neither precalibrated cameras nor calibration targets. Virtual scene models can take the place of a real calibration target for the purpose of providing scene information that is used to refine geometric estimates. Refinement of the display parameters aims to reduce the reprojection error, or the error between the theoretical coordinate (generated from the projection of the scene estimate coordinate by the estimated parameters) and the actual coordinate (obtained from pixel cor-respondences). For Christie installations, the final reprojection error of each pixel should be less than 1 pixel. Mystique was not always so capable. Christie’s research department, Christie Labs, has a history of creating solutions for new projection concepts. Part of that strategy has been a long partnership with the University of Waterloo, particularly the Vision and Image Processing (VIP) Lab in Systems Design Engineering. Graduate students study computer vision and machine learning—topics related to problems often at the heart of techniques—which can be used to bring new ideas, meth-ods, and solutions to Mystique and, by extension, to Christie’s customers. Years of investment in research and development, including partnership with the VIP Lab and others, have enabled Mystique to handle challenges beyond any other projec-tor-alignment solution. ID. © 2022, John Wiley and Sons Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 3D dense reconstruction from 2D video sequence via 3D geometric segmentation
    Han, Bing
    Paulson, Christopher
    Wu, Dapeng
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2011, 22 (05) : 421 - 431
  • [42] Geometric Neural Computing for 2D Contour and 3D Surface Reconstruction
    Rivera-Rovelo, Jorge
    Bayro-Corrochano, Eduardo
    Dillmann, Ruediger
    GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA COMPUTING: IN ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2010, : 191 - +
  • [43] Automation and integration of 2D and 3D geometric models of bridge decks
    Sampaio, AZ
    Recuero, A
    PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELLING IN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2000, : 339 - 346
  • [44] Continuous medial representations for geometric object modeling in 2D and 3D
    Yushkevich, P
    Fletcher, PT
    Joshi, S
    Thall, A
    Pizer, SM
    IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 2003, 21 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [45] Geometric fidelity of radiotherapy target volumes in 2D and 3D PET
    Keller, H
    Breen, S
    Jaffray, D
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S144 - S145
  • [46] Hierarchical Metric Learning and Matching for 2D and 3D Geometric Correspondences
    Fathy, Mohammed E.
    Quoc-Huy Tran
    Zia, M. Zeeshan
    Vernaza, Paul
    Chandraker, Manmohan
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2018, PT 15, 2018, 11219 : 832 - 850
  • [47] Comparing 2D and 3D displays for trend estimation: The effects of display augmentation
    Meserth, TA
    Hollands, JG
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43RD ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 1308 - 1312
  • [48] Invited paper: Key design issues for autostereoscopic 2D/3D displays
    Woodgate, Graham J.
    Harrold, Jonathan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIFTH INTERNATIONAL DISPLAY RESEARCH CONFERENCE - EURODISPLAY 2005, 2005, : 24 - 27
  • [49] The comparison of accommodative response and ocular movements in viewing 3D and 2D displays
    Cho, Ta-Hsiung
    Chen, Chien-Yu
    Wu, Pei-Jung
    Chen, Kun-Shiang
    Yin, Li-Te
    DISPLAYS, 2017, 49 : 59 - 64
  • [50] The complex structure of 2D surfaces
    Kawai, H
    Tsuda, N
    Yukawa, T
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 1996, : 653 - 656