Statistical analysis plan for the TRANSLATE (TRANSrectal biopsy versus Local Anaesthetic Transperineal biopsy Evaluation of potentially clinically significant prostate cancer) multicentre randomised controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Marian, Ioana R. [1 ]
Ooms, Alexander [1 ]
Holmes, Jane [2 ]
Parkes, Matthew J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Lamb, Alastair D. [5 ,6 ]
Bryant, Richard J. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Botnar Res Ctr, Oxford Clin Trials Res Unit, Old Rd, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Ctr Biostat, Manchester, England
[4] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr MAHSC, Manchester, England
[5] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Churchill Hosp, Dept Urol, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Statistical analysis plan; Randomised controlled trial; Prostate cancer; Cancer biopsy; Cancer diagnosis; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-024-08224-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background The TRANSLATE (TRANSrectal biopsy versus Local Anaesthetic Transperineal biopsy Evaluation) trial assesses the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two biopsy procedures in terms of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). This article describes the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the TRANSLATE randomised controlled trial (RCT).Methods/design TRANSLATE is a parallel, superiority, multicentre RCT. Biopsy-na & iuml;ve men aged >= 18 years requiring a prostate biopsy for suspicion of possible PCa are randomised (computer-generated 1:1 allocation ratio) to one of two biopsy procedures: transrectal (TRUS) or local anaesthetic transperineal (LATP) biopsy. The primary outcome is the difference in detection rates of clinically significant PCa (defined as Gleason Grade Group >= 2, i.e. any Gleason pattern >= 4 disease) between the two biopsy procedures. Secondary outcome measures are th eProBE questionnaire (Perception Part and General Symptoms) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF, Domain A) scores, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) values, EQ-5D-5L scores, resource use, infection rates, complications, and serious adverse events. We describe in detail the sample size calculation, statistical models used for the analysis, handling of missing data, and planned sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This SAP was pre-specified, written and submitted without prior knowledge of the trial results.Discussion Publication of the TRANSLATE trial SAP aims to increase the transparency of the data analysis and reduce the risk of outcome reporting bias. Any deviations from the current SAP will be described and justified in the final study report and results publication.Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN98159689, registered on 28 January 2021 and registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05179694) trials registry.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study)
    Mian, Badar M.
    Kaufman, Ronald P., Jr.
    Fisher, Hugh A. G.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2021, 24 (03) : 688 - 696
  • [12] Optimizing prostate biopsy techniques
    Omer, Altan
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) : 578 - 586
  • [13] Prostate Cancer Foundation (Institution) IS of UP, 2021, Gleason Score and Grade Group
  • [14] The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction
    Rosen, RC
    Riley, A
    Wagner, G
    Osterloh, IH
    Kirkpatrick, J
    Mishra, A
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (06) : 822 - 830
  • [15] Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: A critical analysis of the literature
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Zlotta, Alexandre
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Schulman, Claude
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (05) : 1309 - 1322
  • [16] Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?
    Sullivan, Thomas R.
    White, Ian R.
    Salter, Amy B.
    Ryan, Philip
    Lee, Katherine J.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (09) : 2610 - 2626
  • [17] White I., 2017, Stata module to analyse a randomised controlled trial (RCT) allowing for informatively missing outcome data. Computer Science Statistical Software Components