Iterative qualitative approach to establishing content validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for arm lymphedema: the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module

被引:0
作者
Kaur, Manraj N. [1 ]
Cornacchi, Sylvie D. [2 ]
Tsangaris, Elena [3 ]
Poulsen, Lotte [4 ]
Beelen, Louise M. [5 ]
Bordeleau, Louise [6 ]
Zhong, Toni [7 ]
Jorgensen, Mads Gustaf [4 ]
Sorensen, Jens Ahm [4 ]
Mehrara, Babak [8 ]
Dayan, Joseph [8 ]
Pusic, Andrea L. [1 ]
Klassen, Anne F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Pediat, 3N27,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] Modus Outcomes, CIC 1 Broadway,14th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit Plast Surg, JB Winslows Vej 4, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[5] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Juranvinski Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, 699 Concess St, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 8NU-871,200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Lymphedema; Patient-reported outcomes; Patient-reported outcome measure; Breast cancer-related lymphedema; Arm swelling; TASK-FORCE; PRO INSTRUMENTS; BREAST-CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-024-00701-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBreast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) is one of the most common causes of upper extremity (UE) lymphedema in developed nations and substantially impacts health-related quality of life. To advance our understanding of the epidemiology and treatment of BRCL, rigorously developed and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are needed. This study aimed to demonstrate the iterative content validity of a modular UE lymphedema-specific PROM called the LYMPH-Q UE module.MethodsA multi-step iterative qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interview data from in-depth qualitative interviews with adult women (18 years and older) with BCRL were used to develop the first set of the LYMPH-Q UE scales. The content validity of these scales was demonstrated with patient and clinician feedback. Over the course of cognitive debriefing interviews, additional concepts of lymphedema worry and impact on work were identified as missing from the LYMPH-Q UE module. Subsequently, two new qualitative studies (a focus group and in-depth concept elicitation interviews with patients) were conducted, and two new scales were developed to measure lymphedema worry and impact on work life and their content validity was demonstrated.ResultsQualitative data from in-depth and cognitive interviews with 15 (age 40-74 years) and 16 (age 38-74 years) women with BRCL, respectively, and feedback from 12 clinical experts, were used to develop and demonstrate the content validity of six LYMPH-Q UE scales measuring symptoms, function, appearance, psychological, information, and arm sleeve. Additionally, data from in-depth interviews with 12 (age 35-72 years) women with UE lymphedema and four focus groups (n = 16 women; age 35-74 years) was used to develop and assess the content validity of two new LYMPH-Q UE scales measuring lymphedema worry and impact on work life. The content validity of the previously established six scales was also demonstrated in these subsequent qualitative studies.ConclusionThe LYMPH-Q UE is a modular PROM developed using international guidelines for PROM development and can be used in clinical practice, research, and quality improvement to enhance patient-centered shared decision-making. This study's innovative and iterative approach to content validation demonstrates that the LYMPH-Q UE is a comprehensive measure that includes important concepts relevant to patients with UE lymphedema.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Andrich D, 2011, EXPERT REV PHARM OUT, V11, P571, DOI [10.1586/erp.11.59, 10.1586/ERP.11.59]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[3]   Best-practice guidelines in assessment, risk reduction, management, and surveillance for post-breast cancer lymphedema [J].
Armer J.M. ;
Hulett J.M. ;
Bernas M. ;
Ostby P. ;
Stewart B.R. ;
Cormier J.N. .
Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2013, 5 (2) :134-144
[4]   Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis [J].
Beelen, Louise Marie ;
van Dishoeck, Anne-Margreet ;
Tsangaris, Elena ;
Coriddi, Michelle ;
Dayan, Joseph H. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Klassen, Anne ;
Vasilic, Dalibor .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) :1656-1668
[5]   Reconstructing Readability: Recent Developments and Recommendations in the Analysis of Text Difficulty [J].
Benjamin, Rebekah George .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 24 (01) :63-88
[6]   Revision of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL): Reliability and Validity [J].
De Vrieze, Tessa ;
Vos, Lore ;
Gebruers, Nick ;
De Groef, An ;
Dams, Lore ;
Van der Gucht, Elien ;
Nevelsteen, Ines ;
Devoogdt, Nele .
LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (03) :347-355
[7]   Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): Reliability and Validity [J].
Devoogdt, Nele ;
Van Kampen, Marijke ;
Geraerts, Inge ;
Coremans, Tina ;
Christiaens, Marie-Rose .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 91 (06) :944-957
[8]   Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
DiSipio, Tracey ;
Rye, Sheree ;
Newman, Beth ;
Hayes, Sandi .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (06) :500-515
[9]   Diagnosis and Staging of Lymphedema [J].
Greene, Arin K. ;
Goss, Jeremy A. .
SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 32 (01) :12-16
[10]   International phase 1 study protocol to develop a health state classification system for a preference-based measure for women with breast cancer: the BREAST-Q Utility module [J].
Kaur, Manraj ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Xie, Feng ;
Bordeleau, Louise ;
Zhong, Toni ;
Klassen, Anne .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01)