How sustainable is liquefied natural gas supply chain? An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment model

被引：18
作者：
Al-Yafei H. [1 ]
AlNouss A. [2 ]
Aseel S. [1 ]
Kucukvar M. [3 ]
Onat N.C. [4 ]
Al-Ansari T. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha
[2] College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha
[3] Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha
[4] Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha
来源：
Energy Conversion and Management: X | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词：
Energy supply chain; Environmental life cycle assessment; Life cycle sustainability assessment; Liquefied natural gas; LNG Maritime Transport;
D O I：
10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100246
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Integrating sustainability into the distribution network process is a significant problem for any industry hoping to prosper or survive in today's fast-paced environment. Since gas is one of the world's most important fuel sources, sustainability is more important for the gas industry. While such environmental and economic effects have been extensively researched in the literature, there is little emphasis on the full social sustainability of natural gas production and supply chains in terms of the triple bottom line. This research aims to perform the first hybrid life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of liquefied natural gas and evaluate its performance from the natural gas extraction stage to LNG regasification after delivery through maritime transport carriers. LCSA is used for estimating the social, economic, and environmental impacts of processes, and our life cycle model included the multi-region input–output analysis, Aspen HYSYS, and LNG maritime transport operations sustainability assessment tools. The results spot the light on the most contributors of CO2-eq emission. It is found that LNG loading (export terminal) is the source that generated the highest carbon footprint, followed by the MDEA sweetening unit with the contribution of 40% and 24%, respectively. Socially, around 73% of human health impact comes from SRU and TGTU units which are the most contributors to the particulate matter emission. Based on the interpretation of life cycle results, the environmental indicators show better performance in the pre-separation unit and LNG receiving terminal representing a sustainability factor equal to 1. In terms of social and economic impacts, the natural gas extraction stage presents the best performance among all other stages, with a sustainability factor equal to 1. Based on this study's findings, an integrated framework model is proposed. Various suggestions for sustainability strategies and policies that consider business sustainability and geopolitics risk are presented. © 2022 The Author(s)
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
(2010)
[2]  
Roman-White S.A., Littlefield J.A., Fleury K.G., Allen D.T., Balcombe P., Konschnik K.E., Et al., LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting, ACS Sustainable Chem Eng, 9, 32, pp. 10857-10867, (2021)
[3]  
Oliver M.E., Economies of scale and scope in expansion of the US natural gas pipeline network, Energy Econ, 52, pp. 265-276, (2015)
[4]  
Whitmore W.D., Baxter V.K., Laska S.L., A critique of offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal policy, Ocean Coast Manage, 52, 1, pp. 10-16, (2009)
[5]  
Agnolucci P., Arvanitopoulos T., Industrial characteristics and air emissions: Long-term determinants in the UK manufacturing sector, Energy Econ, 78, pp. 546-566, (2019)
[6]  
Hayashi M., Hughes L., The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security, Energy Policy, 59, pp. 102-111, (2013)
[7]  
Bjorndal E., Bjorndal M., Pardalos P.M., Ronnqvist M., Energy, natural resources and environmental economics, (2010)
[8]  
(2014)
[9]  
Eikens M., Moller M., Economics of the LNG value chain, ECONNECT Energy, (2020)
[10]  
Zhongming Z., Linong L., Wangqiang Z., Wei L., (2017)
1234567