The polarizing content warning: how the media can reduce affective polarization

被引:1
|
作者
Kubin, Emily [1 ,2 ]
von Sikorski, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kaiserslautern Landau RPTU, Dept Psychol, Kaiserslautern, Germany
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
affective polarization; perceived ideological polarization; inoculation theory; media; social media; POLITICAL POLARIZATION; SOURCE CREDIBILITY; METAANALYSIS; PERSUASION; EXPOSURE; COVERAGE; OPINION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1093/hcr/hqae006
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Past research suggests that journalists can (unintentionally) exacerbate affective polarization when reporting on growing levels of polarization in society. However, is there a way for journalists to report on the realities of growing political polarization without dividing people further? In our research with five pre-registered experimental studies (N = 3,414), we develop the polarizing content warning which, based on inoculation theory, warns readers that scientific research suggests reading news content about political polarization may drive further affective polarization. Results indicate that the polarizing content warning can be used both with online news articles and on social media sites, and is able to indirectly reduce affective polarization of readers. Additionally, the polarizing content warning is beneficial both when presented alongside news content and beforehand, and reduces readers' perceptions of societal polarization, in turn reducing affective polarization. This warning allows journalists to report on societal polarization without further dividing people.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 418
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How Affective Polarization Deepens the Partisan Divide in US Cable News Use
    Kim, Youngju
    Kim, Yonghwan
    JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY-THEORIES METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 36 (06) : 369 - 380
  • [42] How social media can undermine democracy
    Gradwohl, Ronen
    Heller, Yuval
    Hillman, Arye
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2025, 86
  • [43] Drifting Further Apart? How Exposure to Media Portrayals of Muslims Affects Attitude Polarization
    Schmuck, Desiree
    Heiss, Raffael
    Matthes, Joerg
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : 1055 - 1072
  • [44] Content creators on Instagram-How users cope with stress on social media
    Haug, Maximilian
    Reiter, Julia
    Gewald, Heiko
    TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS REPORTS, 2024, 13
  • [45] You've Lost That Loving Feeling: How Gender Shapes Affective Polarization
    Ondercin, Heather Louise
    Lizotte, Mary Kate
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (03) : 282 - 292
  • [46] News consumption and affective polarization in Taiwan: The mediating roles of like-minded discussion and relative hostile media perception
    Zheng, Xia
    Lu, Yanqin
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2021,
  • [47] How focused identities can help brands navigate a changing media landscape
    Brasel, S. Adam
    BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2012, 55 (03) : 283 - 291
  • [48] The (Political) Show Must Go On: The Effects of Political Media and Family Relationships on Affective Polarization
    Schroeder, Makenzie
    Figueroa-Caballero, Andrea
    JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2024,
  • [49] Political knowledge and affective polarization: a spillover mechanism through emotions toward partisan media
    Zheng, Xia
    Lu, Yanqin
    Choi, Jihyang
    Lee, Jae Kook
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2025, 51 (02) : 126 - 137
  • [50] Using affective content to promote high-involvement services on social media
    Tran, Hai-Anh
    Farrell, Andrew
    Evanschitzky, Heiner
    Nguyen, Bach
    Ackfeldt, Anna-Lena
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 179