Evaluating cancer patient-reported experience measures against health literacy best practices

被引:0
作者
Giannopoulos, Eleni [1 ]
Moody, Lesley [4 ,5 ]
Mackinnon, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Gill, Bhajan [1 ,3 ]
Giuliani, Meredith E. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Papadakos, Janet K. [1 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Canc Hlth Literacy Res Ctr, 585 Univ Ave,ELLICSR PMB B-130, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Sch Publ Hlth, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Ambulatory Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Inst Educ Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Patient-reported experience measures; Patient experience; Health literacy; Cancer; Survey development; Patient-centered care; OUTCOME MEASURES; MEASURES PREMS; READABILITY; PROVIDERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-024-08838-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposePositive patient experiences can lead to better adherence to cancer treatment and greater patient health outcomes. The primary aim of this descriptive study was to determine whether commonly used cancer PREMs have been developed according to health literacy best practices. The secondary and third aims were to examine the development of PREMs and to assess their comprehensiveness against principles of patient-centered care.MethodsTo assess adherence to best practice literacy principles regarding readability and understandability of commonly used cancer PREMs, three validated readability calculators and a validated instrument were utilized. To better understand how PREMs were developed, data about survey items, patient involvement, and expert consultation were collected. Finally, the Picker framework was used to evaluate the comprehensiveness of PREMs against principles of patient-centered care.ResultsThirty-five PREMs studies met inclusion criteria for the study. The mean reading grade level of cancer PREMs was 9.7 (SD = 0.75, range = 8.2-11.2) with best practice recommendation being a grade 6 reading grade level. Twenty-eight PREMs were rated on understandability, with a mean score of 74% (SD = 10.6, range = 46-93%, with optimal score of greater than 80%). The mean number of items across PREMs was 49 (SD = 31, range = 13-136). Recommendations for the number of items to include in a questionnaire is 25-30 items. Most PREMs (n = 33, 94.3%) asked >= 1 double-barreled question. All PREMs addressed >= 2 patient-centered care principles.ConclusionCancer PREMs included in this study did not meet evidence-informed thresholds for readability and understandability. As such, it is possible that there may be gaps in how we understand the care experiences of low health literacy populations. Future development of PREMs should engage patients with low health literacy to ensure their perspectives are accurately captured and that PREMs are designed to meet the needs of all patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determinants of patient-reported experience of cancer services responsiveness
    Tremblay, Dominique
    Roberge, Daniele
    Berbiche, Djamal
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [32] Use of Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Care: A Systematic Review
    Bele, Sumedh
    Teela, Lorynn
    Zhang, Muning
    Rabi, Sarah
    Ahmed, Sadia
    van Oers, Hedy Aline
    Gibbons, Elizabeth
    Dunnewold, Nicole
    Haverman, Lotte
    Santana, Maria J.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 9
  • [33] Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review
    Kang, Yichen
    Guan, Tingyu
    Chen, Xiao
    Zhang, Yuxia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 2024 : 5166392
  • [34] Patient-Reported Experience Measures in outpatient rheumatology care: a systematic review
    Bryant, Madeleine J.
    Schubert, Jonathon P.
    Black, Rachel J.
    Hill, Catherine L.
    RHEUMATOLOGY ADVANCES IN PRACTICE, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [35] Patient-reported experience measures for people living with dementia: A scoping review
    Chapman, Madison
    Milte, Rachel
    Dawson, Suzanne
    Laver, Kate
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 23 (08): : 1354 - 1381
  • [36] Readability of Patient Education Materials in Hand Surgery and Health Literacy Best Practices for Improvement
    Hadden, Kristie
    Prince, Latrina Y.
    Schnaekel, Asa
    Couch, Cory G.
    Stephenson, John M.
    Wyrick, Theresa O.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (08): : 825 - 832
  • [37] Developing a protocol for adapting multimedia patient-reported outcomes measures for low literacy patients
    Long, Chao
    Beres, Laura K.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Giladi, Aviram M.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [38] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [39] The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology
    Janice S. Withycombe
    Molly McFatrich
    Laura Pinheiro
    Pamela S. Hinds
    Frank G. Keller
    Justin N. Baker
    Jenny W. Mack
    Lillian Sung
    Mia K. Waldron
    Bryce B. Reeve
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 1793 - 1801
  • [40] Instruments for assessing patient-reported experience measures among patients with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
    Tint, Soe Sandi
    Oo, Myo Zin
    Buawangpong, Nida
    Jiraporncharoen, Wichuda
    Wiwatkunupakarn, Nutchar
    Rerkasem, Kittipan
    Kulprachakarn, Kanokwan
    Chuljerm, Hataichanok
    O'Brien, Timothy E.
    Mathur, Rohini
    Angkurawaranon, Chaisiri
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2025, 9 (01)