Evaluating cancer patient-reported experience measures against health literacy best practices

被引:0
|
作者
Giannopoulos, Eleni [1 ]
Moody, Lesley [4 ,5 ]
Mackinnon, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Gill, Bhajan [1 ,3 ]
Giuliani, Meredith E. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Papadakos, Janet K. [1 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Canc Hlth Literacy Res Ctr, 585 Univ Ave,ELLICSR PMB B-130, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Sch Publ Hlth, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Ambulatory Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Inst Educ Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Patient-reported experience measures; Patient experience; Health literacy; Cancer; Survey development; Patient-centered care; OUTCOME MEASURES; MEASURES PREMS; READABILITY; PROVIDERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-024-08838-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposePositive patient experiences can lead to better adherence to cancer treatment and greater patient health outcomes. The primary aim of this descriptive study was to determine whether commonly used cancer PREMs have been developed according to health literacy best practices. The secondary and third aims were to examine the development of PREMs and to assess their comprehensiveness against principles of patient-centered care.MethodsTo assess adherence to best practice literacy principles regarding readability and understandability of commonly used cancer PREMs, three validated readability calculators and a validated instrument were utilized. To better understand how PREMs were developed, data about survey items, patient involvement, and expert consultation were collected. Finally, the Picker framework was used to evaluate the comprehensiveness of PREMs against principles of patient-centered care.ResultsThirty-five PREMs studies met inclusion criteria for the study. The mean reading grade level of cancer PREMs was 9.7 (SD = 0.75, range = 8.2-11.2) with best practice recommendation being a grade 6 reading grade level. Twenty-eight PREMs were rated on understandability, with a mean score of 74% (SD = 10.6, range = 46-93%, with optimal score of greater than 80%). The mean number of items across PREMs was 49 (SD = 31, range = 13-136). Recommendations for the number of items to include in a questionnaire is 25-30 items. Most PREMs (n = 33, 94.3%) asked >= 1 double-barreled question. All PREMs addressed >= 2 patient-centered care principles.ConclusionCancer PREMs included in this study did not meet evidence-informed thresholds for readability and understandability. As such, it is possible that there may be gaps in how we understand the care experiences of low health literacy populations. Future development of PREMs should engage patients with low health literacy to ensure their perspectives are accurately captured and that PREMs are designed to meet the needs of all patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Stroke Care A Systematic Review
    Cornelis, Cosette
    den Hartog, Sanne J.
    Bastemeijer, Carla M.
    Roozenbeek, Bob
    Nederkoorn, Paul J.
    Van den Berg-vos, Renske M.
    STROKE, 2021, 52 (07) : 2432 - 2435
  • [22] A qualitative study to identify thematic areas for HIV related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM)
    Lohiniva, Anna-Leena
    Isosomppi, Sanna
    Pasanen, Sini
    Sutinen, Jussi
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [23] Development and Integration of Patient-Reported Measures into E-Health System: Pilot Feasibility Study
    Vaitkeviciene, Goda Elizabeta
    Azukaitis, Karolis
    Jankauskiene, Augustina
    Petrene, Juste
    Puronaite, Roma
    Trinkunas, Justas
    Jankauskiene, Danguole
    Maglaveras, Nicos K.
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (16)
  • [24] A qualitative study to identify thematic areas for HIV related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM)
    Anna-Leena Lohiniva
    Sanna Isosomppi
    Sini Pasanen
    Jussi Sutinen
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [25] Readability analysis of pediatric otolaryngology patient-reported outcome measures
    Dorismond, Christina
    Farzal, Zainab
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Lee, Saangyoung E.
    Zdanski, Carlton J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 140
  • [26] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [27] Patient-reported measures outcomes: modern evaluation of oral health
    Douglas-de-Oliveira, Dhelfeson Willya
    Chen, Kitty Jieyi
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [28] Patient-reported measures outcomes: modern evaluation of oral health
    Dhelfeson Willya Douglas-de-Oliveira
    Kitty Jieyi Chen
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [29] Patient-reported health literacy scores are associated with readmissions following surgery
    Baker, Samantha
    Malone, Emily
    Graham, Laura
    Dasinger, Elise
    Wahl, Tyler
    Titan, Ashley
    Richman, Joshua
    Copeland, Laurel
    Burns, Edith
    Whittle, Jeffrey
    Hawn, Mary
    Morris, Melanie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 220 (05) : 1138 - 1144
  • [30] Determinants of patient-reported experience of cancer services responsiveness
    Dominique Tremblay
    Danièle Roberge
    Djamal Berbiche
    BMC Health Services Research, 15