An improved cross-correlation method for efficient clouds forecasting

被引:0
作者
Zuo, Hui-Min [1 ]
Qiu, Jun [2 ,3 ]
Li, Fang-Fang [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Water Resources & Civil Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Qinghai Univ, Key Lab Plateau Ecol & Agr, Xining 810016, Peoples R China
[4] Shihezi Univ, Coll Water & Architectural Engn, Shihezi 832003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cloud motion modeling; Cross-correlation method (CCM); Particle swarm optimization (PSO); Extrapolation strategy; Ground-based sky image; SKY IMAGER; SOLAR; MOTION; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00704-024-04985-9
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Accurate real-time forecasting of cloud positions relative to the sun is essential for photovoltaic (PV) scheduling. Due to its simplicity, the Cross-Correlation Method (CCM) has been widely used in short-term solar radiation prediction by estimating Cloud Motion Vectors (CMVs). However, comparing each pixel block in the current image with neighboring rectangular areas in the previous image results in increased computational complexity for CCM, which limits its application in short-term solar radiation forecasting. This study utilizes the parallel optimization capability of the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm to simultaneously search for the best matching block for multiple pixel blocks to improve CCM's usability. The results show that the proposed PSO-CCM can estimate CMVs at least five times faster while ensuring forecasting accuracy, significantly reducing the computational complexity of traditional CCM. In addition, as a crucial step in cloud image forecasting, the extrapolation strategy of cloud images also plays a crucial role. Thus, this study also explores and analyzes in detail the advantages and disadvantages of two extrapolation strategies: Block-Wise Forecasting Method and Frozen Cloud Advection Method, offering valuable insights for short-term solar radiation forecasting models based on ground-based sky images.
引用
收藏
页码:6491 / 6505
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Solar irradiance resource and forecasting: a comprehensive review [J].
Kumar, Dhivya Sampath ;
Yagli, Gokhan Mert ;
Kashyap, Monika ;
Srinivasan, Dipti .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2020, 14 (10) :1641-1656
[22]   Hybrid Cloud Detection Algorithm Based on Intelligent Scene Recognition [J].
Li, Fang-Fang ;
Zuo, Hui-Min ;
Jia, Ying-Hui ;
Wang, Qi ;
Qiu, Jun .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 39 (06) :837-847
[23]   Recent advances in intra-hour solar forecasting: A review of ground-based sky image methods [J].
Lin, Fan ;
Zhang, Yao ;
Wang, Jianxue .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2023, 39 (01) :244-265
[24]   Retrieving cloud characteristics from ground-based daytime color all-sky images [J].
Long, CN ;
Sabburg, JM ;
Calbó, J ;
Pagès, D .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 23 (05) :633-652
[25]   An Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network for Old Landslide Detection Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images [J].
Lu, Zili ;
Peng, Yuexing ;
Li, Wei ;
Yu, Junchuan ;
Ge, Daqing ;
Han, Lingyi ;
Xiang, Wei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61
[26]   Intra-hour DNI forecasting based on cloud tracking image analysis [J].
Marquez, Ricardo ;
Coimbra, Carlos F. M. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2013, 91 :327-336
[27]   Determination of Cloud Motion Applying the Lucas-Kanade Method to Sky Cam Imagery [J].
Mondragon, Roman ;
Alonso-Montesinos, Joaquin ;
Riveros-Rosas, David ;
Bonifaz, Roberto .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (16)
[28]  
Paletta Q, 2020, ARXIV, DOI [10.48550/arXiv.2012.01059, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2012.01059]
[29]   ECLIPSE: Envisioning CLoud Induced Perturbations in Solar Energy [J].
Paletta, Quentin ;
Hu, Anthony ;
Arbod, Guillaume ;
Lasenby, Joan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 326
[30]   A hybrid approach to estimate the complex motions of clouds in sky images [J].
Peng, Zhenzhou ;
Yu, Dantong ;
Huang, Dong ;
Heiser, John ;
Kalb, Paul .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2016, 138 :10-25