Automatic well test interpretation based on convolutional neural network for a radial composite reservoir

被引:0
|
作者
Li D. [1 ]
Liu X. [1 ]
Zha W. [1 ]
Yang J. [2 ]
Lu D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
[2] Daqing Well Logging Technology Service Company, Daqing
[3] University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
来源
| 2020年 / Science Press卷 / 47期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Automatic interpretation; Convolutional neural network; Radial composite reservoir; Well testing interpretation;
D O I
10.11698/PED.2020.03.14
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An automatic well test interpretation method for radial composite reservoirs based on convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed, and its effectiveness and accuracy are verified using actual field data. In this paper, Based on the data transformed by logarithm function and the loss function of mean square error (MSE), the optimal CNN is obtained by reducing the loss function to optimize the network with "dropout" method to avoid over fitting. The trained optimal network can be directly used to interpret the buildup or drawdown pressure data of the well in the radial composite reservoir, that is, the log-log plot of the given measured pressure variation and its derivative data are input into the network, the outputs are corresponding reservoir parameters (mobility ratio, storativity ratio, dimensionless composite radius, and dimensionless group characterizing well storage and skin effects), which realizes the automatic initial fitting of well test interpretation parameters. The method is verified with field measured data of Daqing Oilfield. The research shows that the method has high interpretation accuracy, and it is superior to the analytical method and the least square method. © 2020, The Editorial Board of Petroleum Exploration and Development. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 591
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] MOHAGHEGH S D., Reservoir simulation and modeling based on artificial intelligence and data mining (AI & DM), Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 3, 6, pp. 697-705, (2011)
  • [2] ESMAILI S, MOHAGHEGH S D., Full field reservoir modeling of shale assets using advanced data-driven analytics, Geoscience Frontiers, 7, 1, pp. 11-20, (2016)
  • [3] AKIN S, KOK M V, URAZ I., Optimization of well placement geothermal reservoirs using artificial intelligence, Computers & Geosciences, 36, 6, pp. 776-785, (2010)
  • [4] PANJA P, VELASCO R, PATHAK M, Et al., Application of artificial intelligence to forecast hydrocarbon production from shales, Petroleum, 4, 1, pp. 75-89, (2018)
  • [5] LI Daolun, LU Detang, KONG Xiangyan, Et al., Processing of well log data based on backpropagation neural network implicit approximation, Acta Petrolei Sinica, 28, 3, pp. 105-108, (2007)
  • [6] LI D, LU D, ZHA W., Implicit approximation of neural network and applications, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 12, 6, pp. 921-928, (2009)
  • [7] ASADISAGHANDI J, TAHMASEBI P., Comparative evaluation of back-propagation neural network learning algorithms and empirical correlations for prediction of oil PVT properties in Iran oilfields, Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 78, 2, pp. 464-475, (2011)
  • [8] ENAB K, ERTEKIN T., Artificial neural network based design for dual lateral well applications, Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 123, pp. 84-95, (2014)
  • [9] SINGH S, KANLI A I, SEVGEN S., A general approach for porosity estimation using artificial neural network method: A case study from Kansas gas field, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 60, 1, pp. 1-11, (2015)
  • [10] MEMON P Q, YONG S P, PAO W, Et al., Dynamic well bottom-hole flowing pressure prediction based on radial basis neural network, Studies in Computational Intelligence, 591, pp. 279-292, (2015)