Predicting response to non-selective beta-blockers with liver-spleen stiffness and heart rate in patients with liver cirrhosis and high-risk varices

被引:3
作者
Giuffre, Mauro [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Dupont, Johannes [1 ,3 ]
Visintin, Alessia [4 ]
Masutti, Flora [4 ]
Monica, Fabio [5 ]
You, Kisung [6 ]
Shung, Dennis L. [1 ]
Croce, Lory Saveria [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med Digest Dis, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Univ Trieste, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
[3] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[4] Trieste Univ Hosp, Liver Clin, Trieste, Italy
[5] Trieste Univ Hosp, Gastroenterol & Endoscopy Unit, Trieste, Italy
[6] CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, Dept Math, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
Liver cirrhosis; High-risk varices; Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB); Primary prophylaxis; Spleen stiffness (SS); Liver stiffness (LS); Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG); Elastography; Variceal hemorrhage; Machine learning; PORTAL-HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; ELASTOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGEAL; CONSENSUS; PRESSURE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12072-024-10649-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) are used for primary prophylaxis in patients with liver cirrhosis and high-risk varices (HRVs). Assessing therapeutic response is challenging due to the invasive nature of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. This study aims to define a noninvasive machine-learning based approach to determine response to NSBB in patients with liver cirrhosis and HRVs. Methods We conducted a prospective study on a cohort of cirrhotic patients with documented HRVs receiving NSBB treatment. Patients were followed-up with clinical and elastography appointments at 3, 6, and 12 months after NSBB treatment initiation. NSBB response was defined as stationary or downstaging variceal grading at the 12-month esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). In contrast, non-response was defined as upstaging variceal grading at the 12-month EGD or at least one variceal hemorrhage episode during the 12-month follow-up. We chose cut-off values for univariate and multivariate model with 100% specificity. Results According to least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) percentual decrease, along with changes in heart rate (HR) at 3 months were the most significant predictors of NSBB response. A decrease > 11.5% in SS, > 16.8% in LS, and > 25.3% in HR was associated with better prediction of clinical response to NSBB. SS percentual decrease showed the highest accuracy (86.4%) with high sensitivity (78.8%) when compared to LS and HR. The multivariate model incorporating SS, LS, and HR showed the highest discrimination and calibration metrics (AUROC = 0.96), with the optimal cut-off of 0.90 (sensitivity 94.2%, specificity 100%, PPV 95.7%, NPV 100%, accuracy 97.5%).
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 471
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and cirrhosis-related nodules: Imaging diagnosis and surveillance
    Aube, C.
    Bazeries, P.
    Lebigot, J.
    Cartier, V.
    Boursier, J.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (06) : 455 - 468
  • [2] Update to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Liver Elastography Consensus Statement
    Barr, Richard G.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Rubens, Deborah
    Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
    Ferraioli, Giovanna
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (02) : 263 - 274
  • [3] Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography
    Berzigotti, Annalisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 67 (02) : 399 - 411
  • [4] Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
    Binzberger, Andreas
    Haenle, Mark
    Pfahler, Matthias
    Kratzer, Wolfgang
    Seufferlein, Thomas
    Zizer, Eugen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Shear-Wave Elastography: A Noninvasive Tool for Monitoring Changing Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradients in Patients with Cirrhosis
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    Kim, Yongsoo
    Kim, Jinoo
    Kim, Tae Yeob
    Sohn, Joo Hyun
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (03) : 917 - 926
  • [6] Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests?
    Dajti, Elton
    Alemanni, Luigina Vanessa
    Marasco, Giovanni
    Montagnani, Marco
    Azzaroli, Francesco
    [J]. HEPATIC MEDICINE-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 25 - 36
  • [7] Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension
    de Franchis, Roberto
    Bosch, Jaime
    Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
    Reiberger, Thomas
    Ripoll, Cristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 76 (04) : 959 - 974
  • [9] Update on the role of elastography in liver disease
    Ferraioli, Giovanna
    Roccarina, Davide
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 15
  • [10] Ferral H., 2022, HVPG as a gold standard: consensus statements of panel 1. Portal hypertension VII, P61, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-08552-9_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-08552-9_6]