Long-term outcomes of salvage transurethral high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy for anastomotic recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A retrospective analysis

被引:0
作者
Watanabe, Kenta [1 ]
Kamitani, Nobuhiko [1 ,3 ]
Ikeda, Naoki [1 ]
Kawata, Yujiro [1 ]
Tokiya, Ryoji [1 ]
Hayashi, Takafumi [1 ]
Miyaji, Yoshiyuki [2 ]
Tamada, Tsutomu [1 ]
Katsui, Kuniaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kawasaki Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Kurashiki, Okayama 7010192, Japan
[2] Kawasaki Med Sch, Dept Urol, Kurashiki, Okayama 7010192, Japan
[3] Kawasaki Med Sch, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama 7010192, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; Anastomotic recurrence; High-dose-rate brachytherapy; Salvage therapy; INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY; MORTALITY; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2023.12.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: High -dose -rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) delivers high -dose radiation to local lesions within a short treatment period. There are no reports of salvage transurethral HDR-BT for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of salvage transurethral HDR-BT with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for anastomotic prostate cancer recurrence. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with postoperative prostate cancer who underwent salvage transurethral HDR-BT with EBRT for anastomotic recurrence at our hospital between January 2002 and July 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period and age were 13.1 (range 4.3-18.4) years and 67 (range 63-78) years, respectively. The dose of HDR-BT ranged from 13 to 24 Gy per 2 to 5 fractions, while that of EBRT ranged from 30 to 44 Gy per 15 to 22 fractions. The 1 -year, 5 -year, and 10 -year bFFF rates were 77.8%, 41.7%, and 13.9%, respectively. The 10 -year and 15 -year CSS rates were 100% each. The 10 -year and 15 -year OS rates were 100% and 64.3%, respectively. Six patients were diagnosed with BCR. Two patients experienced Grade 3 hematuria as a late adverse event. There was no exacerbation of urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: No prostate cancer-related deaths were observed, even after a long -term followup. Salvage transurethral HDR-BT after radical prostatectomy is safe and feasible and may be a useful treatment option. (c) 2023 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Management of Biochemical Recurrence after Primary Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Review [J].
Artibani, Walter ;
Porcaro, Antonio Benito ;
De Marco, Vincenzo ;
Cerruto, Maria A. ;
Siracusano, Salvatore .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 100 (03) :251-262
[2]   HIFU as salvage first-line treatment for palpable, TRUS-evidenced, biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A pilot study [J].
Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D. ;
Miano, Roberto ;
Virgili, Guido ;
Vespasiani, Giuseppe ;
Agro, Enrico Finazzi .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (05) :577-583
[3]   Best Practice Statement on Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Babaian, Richard J. ;
Donnelly, Bryan ;
Bahn, Duke ;
Baust, John G. ;
Dineen, Martin ;
Ellis, David ;
Katz, Aaron ;
Pisters, Louis ;
Rukstalis, Daniel ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Thrasher, J. Brantley .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (05) :1993-2004
[4]  
Chaussy C, 2006, UROLOGE, V45, P1271, DOI 10.1007/s00120-006-1214-4
[5]   Salvage Radiation in Men After Prostate-Specific Antigen Failure and the Risk of Death [J].
Cotter, Shane E. ;
Chen, Ming Hui ;
Moul, Judd W. ;
Lee, W. Robert ;
Koontz, Bridget F. ;
Anscher, Mitchell S. ;
Robertson, Cary N. ;
Walther, Philip J. ;
Polascik, Thomas J. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (17) :3925-3932
[6]   Prostate cancer high dose-rate brachytherapy: review of evidence and current perspectives [J].
Dutta, Sunil W. ;
Alonso, Clayton E. ;
Libby, Bruce ;
Showalter, Timothy N. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2018, 15 (01) :71-79
[7]   Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Humphreys, EB ;
Mangold, LA ;
Eisenberger, M ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04) :433-439
[8]   Acute Toxicity and Quality of Life After Dose-Intensified Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy: First Results of the Randomized Trial SAKK 09/10 [J].
Ghadjar, Pirus ;
Hayoz, Stefanie ;
Bernhard, Juerg ;
Zwahlen, Daniel R. ;
Hoelscher, Tobias ;
Gut, Philipp ;
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Hildebrandt, Guido ;
Mueller, Arndt-Christian ;
Plasswilm, Ludwig ;
Papachristofilou, Alexandros ;
Stalder, Lukas ;
Biaggi-Rudolf, Christine ;
Sumila, Marcin ;
Kranzbuehler, Helmut ;
Najafi, Yousef ;
Ost, Piet ;
Azinwi, Ngwa C. ;
Reuter, Christiane ;
Bodis, Stephan ;
Kaouthar, Khanfir ;
Wust, Peter ;
Thalmann, George N. ;
Aebersold, Daniel M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (35) :4158-+
[9]   Impact of Dose to the Bladder Trigone on Long-Term Urinary Function After High-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Ghadjar, Pirus ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. ;
Spratt, Daniel E. ;
af Rosenschoeld, Per Munck ;
Oh, Jung Hun ;
Hunt, Margie ;
Kollmeier, Marisa ;
Happersett, Laura ;
Yorke, Ellen ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Jackson, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02) :339-344
[10]   Improved Toxicity Profile Following High-Dose Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiation Therapy With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy [J].
Goenka, Anuj ;
Magsanoc, Juan Martin ;
Pei, Xin ;
Schechter, Michael ;
Kollmeier, Marisa ;
Cox, Brett ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (06) :1142-1148