Performance comparison between closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems using supercritical carbon dioxide and helium-xenon mixture at ultra-high turbine inlet temperatures on hypersonic vehicles

被引:14
作者
Cheng, Kunlin [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jianchi [1 ]
Dang, Chaolei [1 ]
Qin, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
Jing, Wuxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Chongqing Res Inst, Chongqing 400000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Closed; -Brayton; -cycle; Supercritical carbon dioxide; Helium -xenon mixture; Finite cold source; Hypersonic vehicle; CO2-BASED BINARY-MIXTURE; FINITE COLD SOURCE; WORKING FLUID; OPTIMIZATION; CRACKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.130653
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Closed -Brayton -cycle (CBC) has considerable potential for power generation on hypersonic vehicles, but its power level is limited by the cold source onboard, commonly the hydrocarbon fuel. To achieve power enhancement of CBC with finite cold source, this study assessed and compared the power output and thermal efficiency of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) and helium -xenon mixture (He-Xe) CBCs at ultra -high turbine inlet temperature (TIT), taking into account the thermal cracking of hydrocarbon fuel. Results indicate that raising TIT can significantly increase the electric power output for both CBC working fluids. The electric power under per unit mass flowrate of fuel is as high as 1600 kJ/kg at the TIT of 2000 K, making it easy to achieve megawatt -level power generation. The power enhancement of He-Xe CBC is more significant than S-CO2 CBC when the TIT exceeds 2000 K. Moreover, the compressor inlet temperatures and cycle pressure of S-CO2 CBCs are much higher than those of He-Xe CBC, causing additional challenges in the aerodynamic design and component manufacture. Therefore, He-Xe CBC operating at ultra -high TITs may be more suitable than S-CO2 CBCs for highpower electricity generation mission on hypersonic vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop [J].
Ahn, Yoonhan ;
Lee, Jekyoung ;
Kim, Seong Gu ;
Lee, Jeong Ik ;
Cha, Jae Eun ;
Lee, Si-Woo .
ENERGY, 2015, 86 :115-127
[2]   Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle [J].
Akbari, Ata D. ;
Mahmoudi, Seyed M. S. .
ENERGY, 2014, 78 :501-512
[3]   Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower [J].
Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. ;
Atif, Maimoon .
ENERGY, 2015, 82 :61-71
[4]   Exergoeconomic analysis of hybrid sCO2 Brayton power cycle [J].
Alenezi, A. ;
Vesely, L. ;
Kapat, J. .
ENERGY, 2022, 247
[5]   Dual-mode control of hypersonic vehicles [J].
An, Hao ;
Wang, Yiming ;
Wu, Qianqian ;
Wang, Changhong .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2023, 131
[6]   Expectations of closed-Brayton-cycle heat exchangers in nuclear space power systems [J].
Barrett, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2005, 21 (01) :152-157
[7]   Closed Brayton Cycles for Power Generation in Space: Modeling, simulation and exergy analysis [J].
Biondi, Alfonso ;
Toro, Claudia .
ENERGY, 2019, 181 :793-802
[8]   Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles [J].
Cheng, Kunlin ;
Qin, Jiang ;
Sun, Hongchuang ;
Li, Heng ;
He, Shuai ;
Zhang, Silong ;
Bao, Wen .
ENERGY, 2019, 181 :1189-1201
[9]   Thermodynamic analysis for high-power electricity generation systems based on closed-Brayton-cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles [J].
Cheng, Kunlin ;
Qin, Jiang ;
Dang, Chaolei ;
Lv, Chuanwen ;
Zhang, Silong ;
Bao, Wen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (31) :14762-14774
[10]   Thermal efficiency gains enabled by using CO2 mixtures in supercritical power cycles [J].
Crespi, F. ;
Arriba, P. Rodriguez de ;
Sanchez, D. ;
Ayub, A. ;
Di Marcoberardino, G. ;
Invernizzi, C. M. ;
Martinez, G. S. ;
Iora, P. ;
Di Bona, D. ;
Binotti, M. ;
Manzolini, G. .
ENERGY, 2022, 238