Drivers and barriers to innovation in the Australian public service: A qualitative thematic analysis

被引：0

作者：

Wipulanusat W. ^{[1
]}

Panuwatwanich K. ^{[2
]}

Stewart R.A. ^{[3
]}

Sunkpho J. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Walailak University, Thailand

[2] Thammasat University, Thailand

[3] Griffith University, Australia

来源：

Engineering Management in Production and Services | 2019年 / 11卷 / 01期

关键词：

Australia; barriers to innovation; drivers of innovation; public sector innovation; thematic analysis;

D O I：

10.2478/emj-2019-0001

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The purpose of this paper was to identify common themes from archival records related to innovation in the Australian Public Service (APS). A thematic analysis was conducted to review and evaluate archival records which consisted of transcripts from senior manager presentations at Innovation Month seminars from 2014 to 2018 and other related official documents. This empirical study addressed innovation from the leaders' perspective, reflecting upon their experience. Analysing themes within archival records helped to gain insights from various perspectives of leaders on how they regard an innovation agenda for the APS. Three themes emerged from archival records: (1) innovation characteristics; (2) drivers of innovation; and (3) barriers to innovation. Synthesis of these drivers and barriers can provide important insights for senior APS managers on how they can enhance their organisations' ability to innovate in order to respond to digital disruption challenges and opportunities. Variety of perspectives with leader's perceptions informs about authors' selection of the research question among consistent patterns and legitimates the salient themes as input for QSR NVivo 11. © 2019 Warit Wipulanusat et al., published by Sciendo 2019.

引用

页码：7 / 22

页数：15

共 61 条

[31]

Hadfield L., Balancing on the edge of the archive: The researcher's role in collecting and preparing data to deposit, Timescapes Working Paper Series, 2010, 2, pp. 60-74, (2010)

[32]

Hamson N., Why innovation doesn't work: And what to do about it, The Innovation Journal, 9, 1, pp. 1-7, (2004)

[33]

Hsieh H.-F., Shannon S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15, 9, pp. 1277-1288, (2005)

[34]

Kao J., Innovation Nation: How America is Losing Its Innovation Edge, Why It Matters, and What We Can Do to Get It Back, (2007)

[35]

Kellough J.E., Nigro L.G., Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: Employee perspectives on Georgia gain after 5 years, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22, 2, pp. 146-166, (2002)

[36]

Kelly G., Mulgan G., Muers S., Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform, (2002)

[37]

Koch P., Hauknes J., On Innovation in the Public Sector: Academic Summary Report of Publin, (2005)

[38]

Langergaard L.L., Scheuer D.J., Towards a deeper understanding of public sector innovation, Case Studies in Service Innovation, pp. 167-193, (2012)

[39]

Latham J.R., Research Design Canvas: A Framework for Designing and Aligning the "DNA" of Your Study, (2014)

[40]

Empowering Change: Fostering Innovation in the Australian Public Service, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →