Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Strength in Neem and Lemongrass-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
|
作者
Ram, Ashwin Jaikumar [1 ]
Paulraj, Jessy [1 ]
Karthik, V [1 ]
Shanmugam, Rajeshkumar [2 ]
Maiti, Subhabrata [3 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Med Coll & Hosp, Ctr Global Hlth Res,Nanobiomed Lab, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont & Implantol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
modified gic; compressive strength; antimicrobial; neem; lemongrass; restorative dentistry; ESSENTIAL OILS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.56234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Glass ionomer cement (GIC) demonstrates biocompatibility and fluoride ion release, indicating their potential to inhibit a wide range of bacteria, although this remains uncertain. Lemongrass and neem are recognized for their potent antimicrobial activity against numerous pathogenic microorganisms. The objective of the study is to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness and compressive strength of GIC modified with neem and lemongrass. Methodology Lemongrass and neem were incorporated into conventional GIC at varying concentrations. Group I - neemmodified GIC (0.5%, 1%, 2%), group II - lemongrass-modified GIC (0.5%, 1%, 2%), and group III (nonmodified GIC as a control group). The disk -shaped specimens were then compared to unmodified GIC (control). Antimicrobial effectiveness was assessed using the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Compressive strength was assessed using a Universal Testing Machine, with a crosshead speed set to 0.5 mm per minute. Statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results Neem modification displayed superior antimicrobial effectiveness against both Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus at all concentrations when compared to the control, with 2% showing the least mean value of 0.262. In contrast, lemongrass modification exhibited a significant difference in effectiveness against Streptococcus mutans but no difference against Lactobacillus. Neem modification demonstrated superior performance compared to lemongrass (p < 0.05). Both modified groups showed no significant impact on compressive strength. Conclusions Neem-modified GIC demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus without altering its compressive strength. This suggests its potential as a promising alternative material in restorative dentistry. Additional in vivo investigations are needed to assess the extended -term effectiveness of the material.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparative evaluation of the microhardness of glass ionomer cements modified with chitosan and chlorhexidine: A 1-year in vitro study
    Jose, Anu
    Thomas, Abi M.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 11 (06): : 376 - 383
  • [42] Synergistic antibacterial effect of chitosan/silver nanoparticles modified glass ionomer cement (an in vitro study)
    Hussein, Rangin Mohammed
    Kareem, Fadil Abdulla
    OXFORD OPEN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [43] Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles and Cetylpyridinium Chloride Enriched Glass-Ionomer Restorative Cement: A Comparative Study Assessing Compressive Strength and Antibacterial Activity
    Hamid, Nida
    Telgi, Ravishankar Lingesha
    Tirth, Amit
    Tandon, Vaibhav
    Chandra, Smita
    Chaturvedi, Rupesh Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 43 (01) : 42 - 45
  • [44] Glass Ionomer Cement Modified by Resin with Incorporation of Nanohydroxyapatite: In Vitro Evaluation of Physical-Biological Properties
    Genaro, Luis Eduardo
    Anovazzi, Giovana
    Hebling, Josimeri
    Cilense Zuanon, Angela Cristina
    NANOMATERIALS, 2020, 10 (07) : 1 - 12
  • [45] Extract of Propolis on Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: Effect on Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties and Dentin Bonding Strength
    Panahandeh, Narges
    Adinehlou, Fatemeh
    Sheikh-Al-Eslamian, Seyedeh Mahsa
    Torabzadeh, Hassan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS, 2021, 2021
  • [46] Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage Between Nano-Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Cavities-CLSM Study
    Bollu, Indira Priyadarshini
    Hari, Archana
    Thumu, Jayaprakash
    Velagula, Lakshmi Deepa
    Bolla, Nagesh
    Varri, Sujana
    Kasaraneni, Srikanth
    Nalli, Siva Venkata Malathi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (05) : ZC66 - ZC70
  • [47] Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of bulk fill composites - An in vitro study
    Hegde, Nishmitha N.
    Attavar, Shruthi
    Hegde, Mithra N.
    Priya, G.
    MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 19 (75-76) : 16 - 19
  • [48] Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Biodentine as Dentin Substitutes to Bonded Silver Amalgam and Composite Resin
    Thakkar, Riddhi
    Kini, Sandya
    Upadhya, Nagaraja P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (11) : ZC18 - ZC21
  • [49] An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets
    Cook, PA
    Luther, F
    Youngson, CC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1996, 18 (02) : 199 - 204
  • [50] Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material - An in Vitro Study
    Singh, Harpreet
    Rashmi, Shashi
    Pai, Swathi
    Kini, Sandya
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2020, 20