Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Strength in Neem and Lemongrass-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
|
作者
Ram, Ashwin Jaikumar [1 ]
Paulraj, Jessy [1 ]
Karthik, V [1 ]
Shanmugam, Rajeshkumar [2 ]
Maiti, Subhabrata [3 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Med Coll & Hosp, Ctr Global Hlth Res,Nanobiomed Lab, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont & Implantol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
modified gic; compressive strength; antimicrobial; neem; lemongrass; restorative dentistry; ESSENTIAL OILS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.56234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Glass ionomer cement (GIC) demonstrates biocompatibility and fluoride ion release, indicating their potential to inhibit a wide range of bacteria, although this remains uncertain. Lemongrass and neem are recognized for their potent antimicrobial activity against numerous pathogenic microorganisms. The objective of the study is to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness and compressive strength of GIC modified with neem and lemongrass. Methodology Lemongrass and neem were incorporated into conventional GIC at varying concentrations. Group I - neemmodified GIC (0.5%, 1%, 2%), group II - lemongrass-modified GIC (0.5%, 1%, 2%), and group III (nonmodified GIC as a control group). The disk -shaped specimens were then compared to unmodified GIC (control). Antimicrobial effectiveness was assessed using the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Compressive strength was assessed using a Universal Testing Machine, with a crosshead speed set to 0.5 mm per minute. Statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results Neem modification displayed superior antimicrobial effectiveness against both Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus at all concentrations when compared to the control, with 2% showing the least mean value of 0.262. In contrast, lemongrass modification exhibited a significant difference in effectiveness against Streptococcus mutans but no difference against Lactobacillus. Neem modification demonstrated superior performance compared to lemongrass (p < 0.05). Both modified groups showed no significant impact on compressive strength. Conclusions Neem-modified GIC demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus without altering its compressive strength. This suggests its potential as a promising alternative material in restorative dentistry. Additional in vivo investigations are needed to assess the extended -term effectiveness of the material.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Strength of Ginger and Clove-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement
    Paulraj, Jessy
    Pushparathna, Blessy
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    Sharma, Neha
    Shanmugam, Rajeshkumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [2] COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONVENTIONAL AND THYME-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT
    Pavithra, A. S.
    Paulraj, Jessy
    Rajeshkumar, S.
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    ANNALS OF DENTAL SPECIALTY, 2023, 11 (01): : 70 - 77
  • [3] A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Resilience in Chirata and Terminalia arjuna Modified Glass Ionomer Cement
    Devi, Kamala
    Paulraj, Jessy
    George, Rinki S.
    Shanmugam, Rajeshkumar
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [4] Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study
    Rekha, C. Vishnu
    Varma, Balagopal
    Jayanthi
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2012, 3 (03) : 282 - 287
  • [5] Comparative Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Conventional Glass-ionomer Cement with Chitosan-modified Glass-ionomer and Bioactive Glass-modified Glass-ionomer Cement - An In vitro Study
    Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana
    Kavitha, Mahendran
    Venkatesh, Srinivasan
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2021, 12 (01) : 32 - 36
  • [6] Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vitro comparative study
    Arici, S
    Arici, N
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2003, 73 (06) : 692 - 696
  • [7] Green Synthesis and Investigation of Antimicrobial Activity and Compressive Resilience of Glass Ionomer Cement Modified With Zirconia Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study
    Jain, Khushi
    Paulraj, Jessy
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    Shanmugam, Rajeshkumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [8] Miswak-Infused Glass Ionomer Cement: A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antibacterial Efficacy and Compressive Strength
    Devi, Kamala
    Paulraj, Jessy
    Shanmugam, Rajeshkumar
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [9] Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Conventional Type II Glass Ionomer Cement and Triclosan Incorporated Type II Glass Ionomer Cement: An in Vitro Study
    Somani, Rani
    Jaidka, Shipra
    Singh, Deepti Jawa
    Sibal, Gurleen Kaur
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2015, 5 (02) : 88 - 92
  • [10] Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Flexural Strength of GC Gold Hybrid, GIC Conventional and Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement
    Malhotra, Shantun
    Bhullar, Kanwalpreet K.
    Kaur, Sumandeep
    Malhotra, Mahima
    Kaur, Rupam
    Handa, Aashish
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 214 - 216