Size effect on shear failure at core region of reinforced concrete connections: Experimental study

被引:0
作者
Jin L. [1 ]
Miao L. [1 ]
Wei N. [1 ]
Du X. [1 ]
Li Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing
来源
Zhongguo Kexue Jishu Kexue/Scientia Sinica Technologica | 2019年 / 49卷 / 04期
关键词
Core region; Loading type; RC beam-to-column connection; Shear failure; Size effect;
D O I
10.1360/N092018-00111
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fourteen geometrically-similar interior reinforced concrete (RC) beam-to-column connections whose maximum structural sizes were 700 mm×700 mm were designed. The seismic performances of these RC beam-to-column connections subjected to monotonic and low-cycle loading were tested. The effects of loading type, structural size and stirrup ratio on the shear failure behavior at the core region of the connections were studied. Moreover, the size effect on the nominal shear strength of the core region of RC connections was examined, and the sources of size effect were also discussed. The test results and analyses indicate that: (1) all the RC beam-tocolumn connections under monotonic and low-cycle loading failed by shear; (2) due to the existence of low-cycle fatigue damage characteristics, the nominal shear strength of the joints under cyclic loading is lower, and the deformation capacity is weaker; (3) the nominal shear strength decreases with the increase of the structural size of RC connections, and size effect phenomenon is obvious; (4) with the increase of stirrups ratio, the shear bearing capacity and deformation capacity of RC connections increases, at the same time the size effect in shear strength is weakened. In this experiment, the dominant effect of concrete failure and the low-cycle fatigue characteristic of loading are the main reasons for the size effect of shear failure. © 2019, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 468
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Chen S.J., Yeh C.H., Chu J.M., Ductile steel beam-to-column connections for seismic resistance, J Struct Eng, 122, pp. 1292-1299, (1996)
[2]  
Tsonos A.G., Lateral load response of strengthened reinforced concrete beam-to-column joints, ACI Struct J, 96, pp. 46-56, (1999)
[3]  
Vecchio F.J., Collins M.P., The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear, ACI Struct J, 83, pp. 219-231, (1986)
[4]  
Pang X.B., Hsu T.T.C., Fixed angle softened truss model for reinforced concrete, ACI Struct J, 93, pp. 197-207, (1996)
[5]  
Paulay T., Priestly M.J.N., Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, pp. 146-157, (1992)
[6]  
Paulay T., Park R., Joints Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed for Earthquake Resistance, pp. 84-89, (1984)
[7]  
Paulay T., Park R., Preistley M.J.N., Reinforced concrete beam-column joints under seismic actions, J Proc, 75, pp. 585-593, (1978)
[8]  
Azimi M., Adnan A.B., Tahir M.M., Et al., Seismic performance of ductility classes medium RC beam-column connections with continuous rectangular spiral transverse reinforcements, Lat Am J Solids Struct, 12, pp. 787-807, (2015)
[9]  
Najafgholipour M.A., Dehghan S.M., Dooshabi A., Et al., Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beam-column connections with governing joint shear failure mode, Lat Am J Solids Struct, 14, pp. 1200-1225, (2017)
[10]  
Wakabayashi M., Minami K., Nishimura Y., Et al., Anchorage of bent bar in reinforced concrete exterior joints, Trans Japan Concret Inst, 5, pp. 317-324, (1983)