A systematic literature review on greenwashing and its relationship to stakeholders: state of art and future research agenda

被引:76
作者
Santos, Celia [1 ]
Coelho, Arnaldo [1 ]
Marques, Alzira [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, CEBER Ctr Business & Econ Res, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Polytech Leiria, Sch Technol & Management, CARME, Leiria, Portugal
关键词
Greenwashing; Stakeholder; Systematic literature review; VOSviewer; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; CONSUMERS PURCHASE INTENTIONS; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GREEN; DISCLOSURE; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; HOTELS;
D O I
10.1007/s11301-023-00337-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The interest in greenwashing has grown in recent decades. However, comprehensive, and systematic research concentrating on the evolution of this phenomenon, specifically regarding its impacts on stakeholders, is still needed. The main purpose of this study is to provide an overview and synthesis of the existing body of knowledge on greenwashing, through a bibliometric study of articles published up to 2021, identifying the most relevant research in this field. Special attention is given to the latest articles that link greenwashing to stakeholders, identifying gaps and future research opportunities. A bibliometric analysis and literature review was performed on 310 documents obtained from the Web of Science database, using the VOSviewer software program. This article identifies the most influential aspects of greenwashing literature (authors, articles, journals, institutions, and keyword networks). The most recent articles on the effect of greenwashing on stakeholders were also analyzed, which made it possible to identify trends, gaps, and opportunities for future research. These topics include greenwashing impacts on branding, consumer attitudes and intentions, mainly on purchase behavior, B2B relationships and the definition of taxonomy for greenwashing, considering the different practices. This study offers a thorough analysis on the state-of-the-art, as well as a closer look at the impacts of greenwashing on various stakeholders, providing a list of suggestions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1421
页数:25
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology [J].
Ahmad, Wasim ;
Zhang, Qingyu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 267
[3]  
Andreoli T. P., 2017, Rev. Gestao Soc. Ambient. RGSA, V11, P54, DOI [10.24857/rgsa.v11i2.1294, DOI 10.24857/RGSA.V11I2.1294]
[4]   Entrepreneurship in island contexts: A systematic review of the tourism and hospitality literature [J].
Booth, Paul ;
Chaperon, Samantha A. ;
Kennell, James S. ;
Morrison, Alastair M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 85
[5]   Greenwashing effect, attitudes, and beliefs in green consumption [J].
Braga Junior, Sergio ;
Martinez, Marta Pagan ;
Correa, Caroline Miranda ;
Moura-Leite, Rosamaria Cox ;
Da Silva, Dirceu .
RAUSP MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 54 (02) :226-241
[6]   The effect of environmental concern on conscious green consumption of post-millennials: the moderating role of greenwashing perceptions [J].
Bulut, Cagri ;
Nazli, Murat ;
Aydin, Erhan ;
Haque, Adnan Ul .
YOUNG CONSUMERS, 2021, 22 (02) :306-319
[7]   Greenwashing in hotels: A structural model of trust and behavioral intentions [J].
Chen, Han ;
Bernard, Shaniel ;
Rahman, Imran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 :326-335
[8]   Greenwash and green purchase behaviour: the mediation of green brand image and green brand loyalty [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Huang, A-Fen ;
Wang, Ting-Yu ;
Chen, Ying-Rong .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (1-2) :194-209
[9]   The influence of greenwash on green word-of-mouth (green WOM): the mediation effects of green perceived quality and green satisfaction [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Lin, Chang-Liang ;
Chang, Ching-Hsun .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (05) :2411-2425
[10]   Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Chang, Ching-Hsun .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 114 (03) :489-500