Multi-criteria decision making for photovoltaic alternatives: A case study in hot climate country

被引：0

作者：

Miraj P. ^{[1
,3
]}

Berawi M.A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Pancasila University, Jakarta

[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok

[3] Center for Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Universitas Indonesia, Depok

来源：

International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management | 2021年 / 30卷

关键词：

Best-worst method; Multi-criteria decision making; Photovoltaic; Renewable energy; VIKOR method;

D O I：

10.5278/ijsepm.5897

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Photovoltaic (PV) experiences significant growth and has been installed in many locations worldwide over the past decades. However, selecting the best alternative of PV system remains a problem in developing countries, often involving both stakeholders’ interests and multiple objectives. This research proposes a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) taking into account best-worst method (BWM) and VIKOR method for suitable PV alternatives. The combination provides high accuracy, faster data collection, and reliable performance compared to other methods. A case study in Tomia Island in Indonesia is used to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches. The result shows that the best scenario is a full PV installation by combining two villages into one system. It offers the highest power and can be used not only for daily access to electricity but also to support economic activities such as tourism and aquaculture. Despite offering some economic benefits, hybrid alternatives that incorporate non-renewable energy as the main source of energy are less preferred by decision-makers due to low power generation and insignificant carbon reduction. © 2021, Aalborg University press. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：61 / 74

页数：13

共 55 条

[1]

EIA projects 28% increase in world energy use by 2040 2017

[2]

Winanti N, Purwadi A., Study and Design of Distributed Hybrid PV-Generator-Battery System for Communal and Administrative Loadat Sei Bening Village, Sajingan Besar, Indonesia, Proc. - 2018 2nd Int. Conf. Green Energy Appl. ICGEA, 2018, pp. 129-133, (2018)

[3]

UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserve, (2012)

[4]

(2006)

[5]

Armin Razmjoo A, Sumper A., Investigating energy sustainability indicators for developing countries, Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag, 21, pp. 59-76, (2019)

[6]

Berawi MA, Miraj P, Windrayani R, Berawi ARB., Stakeholders’ perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia, Heliyon, 5, (2019)

[7]

Rezaei J., Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega (United Kingdom), 53, pp. 49-57, (2015)

[8]

Baumann M, Weil M, Peters JF, Chibeles-Martins N, Moniz AB., A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 107, pp. 516-534, (2019)

[9]

Banasik A, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Kanellopoulos A, Claassen GDH, van der Vorst JGAJ., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review, Flex Serv Manuf J, 30, pp. 366-396, (2018)

[10]

Ilbahar E, Cebi S, Kahraman C., A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making, Energy Strateg Rev, 25, pp. 18-33, (2019)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →