General practitioners' risk literacy and real-world prescribing of potentially hazardous drugs: a cross-sectional study

被引:1
作者
Wegwarth, Odette [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Tammy C. [3 ]
Goldacre, Ben [4 ]
Spies, Claudia [5 ,6 ]
Giese, Helge A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Campus Charite Mitte, Heisenberg Chair Med Risk Literacy & Evidence Base, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Adpat Rat, Berlin, Germany
[3] Bond Univ, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[5] Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Campus Charite Mitte & Campus Virchow Klinikum, Campus Charite Mitte, Berlin, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Decision making; Healthcare quality improvement; Medical education; Patient safety; RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS; PRIMARY-CARE; PHYSICIANS; BENEFITS; HARMS; NUMERACY; DOCTORS; NUMBERS; RATES; BOX;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016979
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Overuse of medical care is a pervasive problem. Studies using hypothetical scenarios suggest that physicians' risk literacy influences medical decisions; real-world correlations, however, are lacking. We sought to determine the association between physicians' risk literacy and their real-world prescriptions of potentially hazardous drugs, accounting for conflicts of interest and perceptions of benefit-harm ratios in low-value prescribing scenarios. Setting and sample Cross-sectional study-conducted online between June and October 2023 via field panels of Sermo (Hamburg, Germany)-with a convenience sample of 304 English general practitioners (GPs). Methods GPs' survey responses on their treatment-related risk literacy, conflicts of interest and perceptions of the benefit-harm ratio in low-value prescribing scenarios were matched to their UK National Health Service records of prescribing volumes for antibiotics, opioids, gabapentin and benzodiazepines and analysed for differences. Results 204 GPs (67.1%) worked in practices with >= 6 practising GPs and 226 (76.0%) reported 10-39 years of experience. Compared with GPs demonstrating low risk literacy, GPs with high literacy prescribed fewer opioids (mean (M): 60.60 vs 43.88 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.016), less gabapentin (M: 23.84 vs 18.34 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.023), and fewer benzodiazepines (M: 17.23 vs 13.58 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.037), but comparable volumes of antibiotics (M: 48.84 vs 40.61 prescribed volumes/1000 patients/6 months, p=0.076). High-risk literacy was associated with lower conflicts of interest (phi = 0.12, p=0.031) and higher perception of harms outweighing benefits in low-value prescribing scenarios (p=0.007). Conflicts of interest and benefit-harm perceptions were not independently associated with prescribing behaviour (all ps >0.05). Conclusions and relevance The observed association between GPs with higher risk literacy and the prescription of fewer hazardous drugs suggests the importance of risk literacy in enhancing patient safety and quality of care.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 641
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions
    Akl, Elie A.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Herrin, Jeph
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Terrenato, Irene
    Sperati, Francesca
    Costiniuk, Cecilia
    Blank, Diana
    Schuenemann, Holger
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (03):
  • [2] Statistical Literacy in Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Anderson, Britta L.
    Gigerenzer, Gerd
    Parker, Scott
    Schulkin, Jay
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2014, 36 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [3] Physicians' communication of Down syndrome screening test results: The influence of physician numeracy
    Anderson, Britta L.
    Obrecht, Natalie A.
    Chapman, Gretchen B.
    Driscoll, Deborah A.
    Schulkin, Jay
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (08) : 744 - 749
  • [4] Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world
    Brownlee, Shannon
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    Doust, Jenny
    Elshaug, Adam G.
    Glasziou, Paul
    Heath, Iona
    Nagpal, Somil
    Saini, Vikas
    Srivastava, Divya
    Chalmers, Kelsey
    Korenstein, Deborah
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 390 (10090) : 156 - 168
  • [5] Health numeracy skills of medical students:cross-sectional and controlled before-and-after study
    Buljan, Ivan
    Tokalic, Ruzica
    Marusic, Matko
    Marusic, Ana
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [6] Doctors and Numbers: An Assessment of the Critical Risk Interpretation Test
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Prochazka, Allan V.
    Combs, Brandon P.
    Lucas, Brian P.
    Mueller, Shane R.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    Binswanger, Ingrid
    Fagerlin, Angela
    McCormick, Jacqueline
    Pfister, Shirley
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) : 512 - 524
  • [7] Confusing Relative Risk with Absolute Risk Is Associated with More Enthusiastic Beliefs about the Value of Cancer Screening
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Prochazka, Allan V.
    Binswanger, Ingrid A.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (05) : 686 - 692
  • [8] Pharmaceutical Industry-Sponsored Meals and Physician Prescribing Patterns for Medicare Beneficiaries
    DeJong, Colette
    Aguilar, Thomas
    Tseng, Chien-Wen
    Lin, Grace A.
    Boscardin, W. John
    Dudley, R. Adams
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (08) : 1114 - 1122
  • [9] Eddy David., 1988, Professional judgement. A reader in clinical decision making, P45
  • [10] Improving risk literacy in surgeons
    Garcia-Retamero, Rocio
    Cokely, Edward T.
    Wicki, Barbara
    Joeris, Alexander
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (07) : 1156 - 1161