Implementation of supplemental physiotherapy following hip fracture surgery: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Raper, Eleanor [1 ,2 ]
Kimmel, Lara A. [1 ,3 ]
Burge, Angela T. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Harris, Ian A. [5 ,6 ]
Ackerman, Ilana N. [3 ]
Page, Richard S. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Naylor, Justine M. [5 ,6 ]
Hepworth, Graham [10 ]
Gabbe, Belinda [3 ]
Ekegren, Christina L. [11 ]
Harris, Anthony [12 ]
Woode, Maame Esi [12 ]
Holland, Anne E. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Physiotherapy Dept, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Inst Breathing & Sleep, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Whitlam Orthopaed Res Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[6] UNSW Sydney, UNSW Med & Hlth, Sch Clin Med, Sydney, Australia
[7] Deakin Univ, Barwon Ctr Orthopaed Res & Educ, Sch Med, IMPACT, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[8] John God Geelong Hosp, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Hosp Geelong, Dept Orthopaed, Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[10] Univ Melbourne, Stat Consulting Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Monash Univ, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Rehabil Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Melbourne, Australia
[12] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Process evaluation; Implementation; Physical rehabilitation; Hip fracture; Hospitalisation;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-024-08143-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Patient outcomes following low-trauma hip fracture are suboptimal resulting in increased healthcare costs and poor functional outcomes at 1 year. Providing early and intensive in-hospital physiotherapy could help improve patient outcomes and reduce costs following hip fracture surgery. The HIP fracture Supplemental Therapy to Enhance Recovery (HIPSTER) trial will compare usual care physiotherapy to intensive in-hospital physiotherapy for patients following hip fracture surgery. The complex environments in which the intervention is implemented present unique contextual challenges that may impact intervention effectiveness. This study aims to complete a process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and explore the patient, carer and clinician experience of intensive therapy following hip fracture surgery.Methods and analysis The process evaluation is embedded within a two-arm randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded trial recruiting 620 participants from eight Australian hospitals who have had surgery for a hip fracture sustained via a low-trauma injury. A theory-based mixed method process evaluation will be completed in tandem with the HIPSTER trial. Patient and carer semi-structured interviews will be completed at 6 weeks following hip fracture surgery. The clinician experience will be explored through online surveys completed pre- and post-implementation of intensive therapy and mapped to domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Translation and behaviour change success will be assessed using the Reach Effectiveness-Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection methods. These data will assist with the development of an Implementation Toolkit aiding future translation into practice.Discussion The embedded process evaluation will help understand the interplay between the implementation context and the intensive therapy intervention following surgery for low-trauma hip fracture. Understanding these mechanisms, if effective, will assist with transferability into other contexts and wider translation into practice.Trial registration ACTRN 12622001442796.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Australia and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry, 2019, ANZHFR Annual Report of Hip Fracture Care
[2]  
Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry, 2021, ANZHFR Annual Report of Hip Fracture Care 2021
[3]   A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews [J].
Boeije, H .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (04) :391-409
[4]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[5]   Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research [J].
Cane, James ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Michie, Susan .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
[6]  
Chehade M., 2014, Australian and New Zealand guideline for hip fracture care-improving outcomes in hip fracture management of adults
[7]   Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures [J].
Cooper, C. ;
Cole, Z. A. ;
Holroyd, C. R. ;
Earl, S. C. ;
Harvey, N. C. ;
Dennison, E. M. ;
Melton, L. J. ;
Cummings, S. R. ;
Kanis, J. A. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (05) :1277-1288
[8]   GUIDELINES Management of hip fracture in adults: summary of NICE guidance [J].
Ftouh, Saoussen ;
Morga, Antonia ;
Swift, Cameron .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
[9]   The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time [J].
Gaglio, Bridget ;
Shoup, Jo Ann ;
Glasgow, Russell E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (06) :E38-E46
[10]   Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Vogt, TM ;
Boles, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) :1322-1327