Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Subsurface Defect Detection with Sparse Models

被引:0
作者
Zygiridis, Theodoros [1 ]
Kyrgiazoglou, Athanasios [2 ]
Amanatiadis, Stamatios [1 ]
Kantartzis, Nikolaos [3 ]
Theodoulidis, Theodoros [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Macedonia, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Kozani 50100, Greece
[2] Univ Western Macedonia, Dept Mech Engn, Kozani 50100, Greece
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Defects; Eddy-current testing; Polynomial chaos; Sensitivity analysis; Sparse models; Uncertainty; EDDY-CURRENT DETECTION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; CURRENT SENSOR; CRACKS; PROPAGATION; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1007/s10921-024-01114-4
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to conduct a thorough investigation of a stochastic eddy-current testing problem, when the geometric parameters of the system under study are characterized by uncertainty. Focusing on the case of subsurface defect detection, we devise reliable surrogates for the quantities of interest (QoI) based on the principles of the generalized polynomial chaos (PC) and using the orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) solver to promote sparsity in the approximate models. In addition, a variance-based approach is implemented for the sequential construction of the necessary sample set, enabling more accurate estimation of the statistical metrics without imposing additional computational overhead. Apart from quantifying the inherent uncertainty, a sensitivity analysis is performed that assesses the impact of each geometric variable on the QoI, via the computation of Sobol indices. The efficiency of the OMP-PC algorithm is demonstrated in two variants of the subsurface-discontinuity problem, yielding at the same time useful conclusions regarding the properties of the stochastic outputs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION IN EDDY CURRENT NDE INVERSE PROBLEMS [J].
Aldrin, John C. ;
Knopp, Jeremy S. ;
Blodgett, Mark P. ;
Sabbagh, Harold A. .
REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 30A AND 30B, 2011, 1335 :631-638
[2]   Review of advances in quantitative eddy current nondestructive evaluation [J].
Auld, BA ;
Moulder, JC .
JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 1999, 18 (01) :3-36
[3]   Modeling of Eddy Current NDT Simulations by Kriging Surrogate Model [J].
Bao, Yang .
RESEARCH IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2023, 34 (3-4) :154-168
[4]   Characterization of subsurface cracks in eddy current testing using machine learning methods [J].
Barrarat, Fatima ;
Rayane, Karim ;
Helifa, Bachir ;
Lefkaier, Ibn Khaldoun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS, 2022, 35 (06)
[5]   Sensitivity analysis of inverse problems in EM non-destructive testing [J].
Bilicz, Sandor .
IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (05) :543-551
[6]   Sparse Grid Surrogate Models for Electromagnetic Problems With Many Parameters [J].
Bilicz, Sandor .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2016, 52 (03)
[7]   Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression [J].
Blatman, Geraud ;
Sudret, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2011, 230 (06) :2345-2367
[8]   EDDY-CURRENT INTERACTION WITH AN IDEAL CRACK .1. THE FORWARD PROBLEM [J].
BOWLER, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1994, 75 (12) :8128-8137
[9]   HOW TO DISTINGUISH SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CRACKS USING ELECTROMAGNETIC NDT METHODS [J].
BRUDAR, B .
NDT INTERNATIONAL, 1984, 17 (04) :221-223
[10]   Rapid prediction of eddy current testing signals using A-φ method and database [J].
Chen, ZM ;
Miya, K ;
Kurokawa, M .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 32 (01) :29-36