High-precision algorithm for restoration of spectral imaging based on joint solution of double sparse domains

被引：0
作者：
Liu S.-J. [1 ,2 ]
Li C.-L. [1 ]
Xu R. [1 ]
Tang G.-L. [1 ,2 ]
Wu B. [1 ,2 ]
Xu Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wang J.-Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Key Laboratory of Space Active Opto-Electronics Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
[3] Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou
[4] School of Information Science & Techno1ogy, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai
来源：
Hongwai Yu Haomibo Xuebao/Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves | 2021年 / 40卷 / 05期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Compressed sensing; Computational imaging; Spectral feature recovery; Spectral imaging;
D O I：
10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2021.05.016
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Compressed sensing-based spectral imaging systems need to decode the sampled data by a proper algorithm to obtain the final spectral imaging data. Traditional decoding algorithms based on single sparse domain transformation will lead to loss of spectral details. Addressing this problem, a solution is proposed by using transformation of two sparse domains. A signal was decomposed into a low frequency part and a high frequency part, sparse restoration was performed according to the characteristics of different frequencies, and then decoding was performed to obtain high-precision restored signals. In data verification, the OMP algorithm was firstly used to restore the spectral information profile in the frequency domain, then the IRLS algorithm was applied to compensate the spectral details in the spatial domain. The impact of different sparse transformations on parameter settings was analyzed, and the JDSD of different algorithm combinations was tested. Test and simulation results on 500 kinds of spectral data show that the joint solution of double sparse domains can greatly improve the fidelity of spectral restoration. With a sampling rate of 20%, the SAM and GSAM indexes are increased from 0.625 and 0.515 by traditional methods to 0.817 and 0.659, respectively. In the case of 80%sampling rate, the SAM and GSAM indexes are increased from 0.863 and 0.808 of traditional methods to 0.940 and 0.897, respectively. JDSD algorithm can maintain high-precision details such as spectral absorption peaks, which is of great significance. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：685 / 695
页数：10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Donoho D L., Compressed sensing, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52, 4, pp. 1289-1306, (2006)
  • [2] Candes E J, Wakin M B., An Introduction to Compressive Sampling, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25, 2, pp. 21-30, (2008)
  • [3] Duarte M F, Davenport M A, Takhar D, Et al., Single-Pixel Imaging Via Compressive Sampling, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25, 2, pp. 83-91, (2008)
  • [4] Sun T, Kelly K., Compressive sensing hyper spectral imager, Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging, (2009)
  • [5] Yitzhak A, Chaim V, Yair R., Compressive hyper spectral imaging by random separable projections in both the spatial and the spectral domains[J], Applied Optics, 52, 10, pp. D46-D54, (2013)
  • [6] Wagadarikar A, John R, Willett R, Et al., Single Disperser Design for Coded Aperture Snapshot Spectral Imaging, Applied Optics, 47, 10, pp. B44-B51, (2008)
  • [7] Kittle D, Choi K, Wagadarikar A, Multiframe image estimation for coded aperture snapshot spectral imagers[J], Applied Optics, 49, 36, pp. 6824-6833, (2010)
  • [8] Gehm M E, John R, Brady D J, Single-Shot Compressive Spectral Imaging with a Dual-Disperser Architecture, Optics Express, 15, 21, pp. 14013-14027, (2007)
  • [9] Henry Arguello, Gonzalo Arce, Code Aperture Design For Compressive Spectral Imaging[C], 18th European Signal Processing Cofference(EUSIPCO-2010)Aalborg, pp. 1434-1438, (2010)
  • [10] Tropp J, Gilbert A., Signal Recovery from Random Measurements via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53, 12, pp. 4655-4666, (2007)
12