Challenges and solutions to high-resolution data processing for seismic exploration

被引:0
作者
Cao S. [1 ]
Sun Y. [1 ]
Chen S. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum, Beijing
来源
Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration | 2023年 / 51卷 / 01期
关键词
fluvial channel separation; quarter wavelength; resolution; thin reservoir;
D O I
10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.11.0841
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The seismic resolution has long been limited to the quarter wavelength. To compress the seismic wavelet, the key problems are signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution in early stages, and high resolution and high fidelity in late stages. Meanwhile, by using well data, many inversion methods of spanning quarter wavelength have been developed. The success of these methods depends on the preservation of seismic wave amplitude, the accuracy of seismic interpretation, and the compatibility between well data and seismic data. Afterward, researchers achieved seismic inversion without well data constraint, and the corresponding resolution reached the level of reflectivity. Meanwhile, the key problem turned into the credibility of impedance information. In this study, we sort out relevant seismic data and refer to the thoughts and methods of seismic sedimentology, and propose a thin fluvial channel sand body depiction method without well data constraint. This method not only exceeds the limit of quarter wavelength but also guarantees the accuracy of seismic interpretation. Case study is carried out and quarter-wavelength-based superimposed channels are separated. This method shows great prospects for old data mining and new data processing for petroleum and coal companies. In particular, this method provides a new solution to production problems such as the determination of super-thin reservoirs and super-close faults, and the detection of goaf and abandoned tunnels. © Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 288
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
WANG Chengshu, ZHANG Yuping, Adaptive least square deconvolution and application to seismic prospecting[J], Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 30, 3, (1987)
[2]  
LEINBACH J., Wiener spiking deconvolution and minimum: A tutorial[J], The Leading Edge, 14, 3, (1995)
[3]  
PEACOCK K L,, TREITEL S., Predictive deconvolution:Theory and practice[J], Geophysics, 34, 2, (1969)
[4]  
WANG Jun, ZHOU Xingyuan, CAO Mengqi, Improvement and application of homomorphic deconvolution[J], Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 38, Sup.1, pp. 27-30, (2003)
[5]  
Hao LI, Guofa LI, Xiong MA, Et al., Multichannel deconvolution with spatial reflection regularization[J], Applied Geophysics, 18, 1, (2021)
[6]  
TAYLOR H L, BANKS S C, MCCOY J F., Deconvolution with the L<sub>1</sub> norm[J], Geophysics, 44, 1, (1979)
[7]  
DEBEYE H W J,, RIEL P V., L<sub>p</sub>-norm deconvolution[J], Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 4, (1990)
[8]  
ZHANG Fanchang, LIU Jie, YIN Xingyao, Et al., Modified cauchy−constrained seismic blind deconvolution[J], Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 4, (2008)
[9]  
Ming MA, Shangxu WANG, YUAN Sanyi, Et al., Multichannel spatially correlated reflectivity inversion using block sparse Bayesian learning[J], Geophysics, 82, 4, pp. V191-V199, (2017)
[10]  
MENG Dajiang, WANG Deli, FENG Fei, Et al., Sparse deconvolution based on the curvelet transform[J], Acta Petrolei Sinica, 34, 1, (2013)