Adaptive cruise control design for collision risk avoidance

被引:7
作者
Jiang, Yangsheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cong, Hongwei [1 ]
Chen, Hongyu [1 ]
Wu, Yunxia [2 ]
Yao, Zhihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Transportat & Logist, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Natl Engn Lab Integrated Transportat Big Data Appl, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Natl United Engn Lab Integrated & Intelligent Tran, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automated vehicles; Car -following model; Adaptive cruise control; Time delay; Traffic flow characteristics; INTELLIGENT DRIVER MODEL; MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; STABILITY ANALYSIS; STRING STABILITY; CONTROL STRATEGY; SAFETY; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; CACC;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2024.129724
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
With advanced technologies such as perception and automatic control, automated vehicles (AVs) are gradually replacing human-driven vehicles (HDVs). They will become a significant component of transportation systems. As the crucial longitudinal control model for AVs, the existing adaptive cruise control (ACC) model faces challenges such as poor linear stability and compromised safety. To solve the problem, this paper proposes an adaptive cruise control model to avoid collision risk. First, the delay-considerate collision risk control strategy (DCRCS) is developed to consider vehicles' perception and control delay. Then, a proposed adaptive cruise control (PACC) model is designed by incorporating DCRCS into the ACC model based on the control gain coefficient. Finally, the effectiveness of the PACC model is discussed and analyzed in terms of stability, safety, efficiency, energy consumption, and pollutant emissions through a combined approach of theoretical analysis and simulation experiments. The result shows that (1) compared to the classical ACC model, the PACC model demonstrates significant improvements in system stability, reduced safety risks, enhanced efficiency, and decreased energy consumption and pollutant emissions. These enhancements are observed when the control gain coefficient is set to a positive value. (2) The equilibrium speed minimally influences the effectiveness of the PACC model. Under varying speed conditions, the PACC model consistently maintains stable performance. (3) The effectiveness of the PACC model is closely related to the selection of the control gain coefficient. Considering the effects of the control gain coefficient on stability, safety, efficiency, energy consumption, and pollutant emissions of the PACC model, the optimal range for the control gain coefficient is in the range of [0.8, 1.0]. In summary, compared to the classical ACC model, the PACC model exhibits outstanding performance in various aspects. It provides theoretical support for the longitudinal control of AVs in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Design of Platooning Controllers That Achieve Collision Avoidance by External Positivity [J].
Schwab, Alexander ;
Jan Lunze .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (09) :14883-14892
[42]   Optimal Strategies for Adaptive Cruise Control [J].
Mba, Clement U. ;
Novara, Carlo .
SMART CITIES, GREEN TECHNOLOGIES, AND INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2017, 738 :227-241
[43]   Design and field evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control with unconnected vehicle in the loop [J].
Lee, Daegyu ;
Lee, Seungwook ;
Chen, Zheng ;
Park, B. Brian ;
Shim, David Hyunchul .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 132
[44]   Adaptive cruise control system design and its impact on highway traffic flow [J].
Wang, JM ;
Rajamani, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2002, 1-6 :3690-3695
[45]   Ecological Cooperative and Adaptive Cruise Control [J].
Lei, Mingyue ;
Yan, Xuerun ;
Hu, Jia ;
Wang, Haoran .
2023 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, ITSC, 2023, :2424-2427
[46]   Cooperative adaptive cruise platoon controller design considering switching control and stability [J].
Ruan, Tiancheng ;
Chen, Yujia ;
Han, Gengyue ;
Wang, Jian ;
Li, Xiaopeng ;
Jiang, Rui ;
Wang, Wei ;
Wang, Hao .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2025, 172
[47]   Neural Network Predictive Control Approach Design for Adaptive Cruise Control [J].
Mahadika, Pratama ;
Subiantoro, Aries ;
Kusumoputro, Benyamin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 11 (07) :1451-1462
[48]   Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Predictor-Based Control for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control System [J].
Lin, Yu-Chen ;
Ha Ly Thi Nguyen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 21 (03) :1054-1063
[49]   Platoon management with cooperative adaptive cruise control enabled by VANET [J].
Amoozadeh, Mani ;
Deng, Hui ;
Chuah, Chen-Nee ;
Zhang, H. Michael ;
Ghosal, Dipak .
VEHICULAR COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 2 (02) :110-123
[50]   Stability of platoon of adaptive cruise control vehicles with time delay [J].
Hu, San Gen ;
Wen, Hui Ying ;
Xu, Lunhui ;
Fu, Hui .
TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (09) :506-515