The feasibility of reaching gigatonne scale CO2 storage by mid-century

被引：5
|
作者：
Zhang, Yuting [1 ]
Jackson, Christopher [1 ]
Krevor, Samuel [1 ]
机构：
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Earth Sci & Engn, Exhibit Rd, London, England
来源：
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金：
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词：
CARBON CAPTURE; CAPACITY ESTIMATION; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; TECHNOLOGY; AVAILABILITY; ACCEPTANCE; DIOXIDE; MODEL; WIND;
D O I：
10.1038/s41467-024-51226-8
中图分类号：
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
The Sixth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects subsurface carbon storage at rates of 1 - 30 GtCO(2) yr(-1) by 2050. These projections, however, overlook potential geological, geographical, and techno-economic limitations to growth. We evaluate the feasibility of scaling up CO2 storage using a geographically resolved growth model that considers constraints from both geology and scale-up rate. Our results suggest a maximum global storage rate of 16 GtCO(2) yr(-1) by 2050, but this is contingent on the United States contributing 60% of the total. These values contrast with projections in the Sixth Assessment Report that vastly overestimate the feasibility of deployment in China, Indonesia, and South Korea. A feasible benchmark for global CO2 storage projections, and consistent with current government technology roadmaps, suggests a global storage rate of 5-6 GtCO(2) yr(-1), with the United States contributing around 1 GtCO(2) yr(-1).
引用
收藏
页数：13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CO2 storage risk assessment: feasibility study of the systemic method MOSAR
    Cherkaoui, A.
    Lopez, P.
    SAFETY AND SECURITY ENGINEERING III, 2009, 108 : 173 - 184
  • [32] Overview of the geochemical modeling on CO2 capture & storage in Italian feasibility studies
    Cantucci, B.
    Montegrossi, G.
    Buttinelli, M.
    Lucci, F.
    Vaselli, O.
    Quattrocchi, F.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 73 (13) : A190 - A190
  • [33] Economic evaluation of the geological storage of CO2 considering the scale of economy
    Akimoto, Keigo
    Takagi, Masato
    Tomoda, Toshimasa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (02) : 271 - 279
  • [34] Pore-scale modelling of CO2 storage in fractured coal
    Liu, Min
    Mostaghimi, Peyman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2017, 66 : 246 - 253
  • [35] Lessons in the Development of Large-Scale CO2 Storage Projects
    Whittaker, Steve
    Kneppers, Angeline
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 3646 - 3654
  • [36] Injection Strategies for Large-Scale CO2 Storage Sites
    Michael, K.
    Neal, P. R.
    Allinson, G.
    Ennis-King, J.
    Hou, W.
    Paterson, L.
    Sharma, S.
    Aiken, T.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4267 - 4274
  • [37] Experimental investigation of CO2 storage and oil production of different CO2 injection methods at pore-scale and core-scale
    Hao, Yongmao
    Li, Zongfa
    Su, Yuliang
    Kong, Chuixian
    Chen, Hong
    Meng, Yang
    ENERGY, 2022, 254
  • [38] Analysis of unusual scale build-up in a CO2 injection well for a pilot-scale CO2 storage demonstration project
    Sminchak, Joel
    Zeller, Evan
    Bhattacharya, Indrajit
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 4 (03): : 357 - 365
  • [39] Oil recovery and CO2 storage in CO2 flooding
    Zhao, Hailong
    Chang, Yuwen
    Feng, Songlin
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (13) : 1151 - 1156
  • [40] The cross-scale science of CO2 capture and storage: from pore scale to regional scale
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Keating, Gordon N.
    Stauffer, Philip H.
    Jordan, Amy B.
    Viswanathan, Hari S.
    Kang, Qinjun J.
    Carey, J. William
    Mulkey, Marc L.
    Sullivan, Enid J.
    Chu, Shaoping P.
    Esposito, Richard
    Meckel, Timothy A.
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 5 (06) : 7328 - 7345
12345