Investigation on removal of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) using water treatment sludge and biochar

被引:14
|
作者
Nguyen M.D. [1 ]
Sivaram A.K. [2 ,3 ]
Megharaj M. [2 ,3 ]
Webb L. [4 ]
Adhikari S. [1 ]
Thomas M. [5 ]
Surapaneni A. [6 ,7 ]
Moon E.M. [1 ,8 ]
Milne N.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Engineering, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC
[2] Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, ATC Building, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, NSW
[3] Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), The University of Newcastle, ATC Building, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, NSW
[4] School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC
[5] Barwon Water, Geelong, 3220, VIC
[6] South East Water, Frankston, 3199, VIC
[7] ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, College of STEM, RMIT University
[8] ARC Centre of Excellence for Enabling Eco-Efficient Beneficiation of Minerals, School of Engineering, Deakin University
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Adsorption; Biochar; PFAS; Water treatment sludge;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139412
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This work assessed the adsorption performance of three common PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS and PFHxS) on two water treatment sludges (WTS) and two biochars (commercial biomass biochar and semi-pilot scale biosolids biochar). Of the two WTS samples included in this study, one was sourced from poly-aluminium chloride (PAC) and the other from alum (Al2(SO4)3). The results of experiments using a single PFAS for adsorption reinforced established trends in affinity - the shorter-chained PFHxS was less adsorbed than PFOS, and the sulphates (PFOS) were more readily adsorbed than the acid (PFOA). Interestingly, PAC WTS, showed an excellent adsorption affinity for the shorter chained PFHxS (58.8%), than the alum WTS and biosolids biochar at 22.6% and 41.74%, respectively. The results also showed that the alum WTS was less effective at adsorption than the PAC WTS despite having a larger surface area. Taken together, the results suggest that the hydrophobicity of the sorbent and the chemistry of the coagulant were critical factors for understanding PFAS adsorption on WTS, while other factors, such as the concentration of aluminium and iron in the WTS could not explain the trends seen. For the biochar samples, the surface area and hydrophobicity are believed to be the main drivers in the different performances. Adsorption from the solution containing multiple PFAS was also investigated with PAC WTS and biosolids biochar, demonstrating comparable performance on overall adsorption. However, the PAC WTS performed better with the short-chain PFHxS than the biosolids biochar. While both PAC WTS and biosolids biochar are promising candidates for adsorption, the study highlights the need to explore further the mechanisms behind PFAS adsorption, which could be a highly variable source to understand better the potential for WTS to be utilized as a PFAS adsorbent. © 2023 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low serum levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) in children and adults from Afghanistan
    Hemat, Hamayon
    Wilhelm, Michael
    Voelkel, Wolfgang
    Mosch, Christine
    Fromme, Hermann
    Wittsiepe, Juergen
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (16) : 3493 - 3495
  • [2] Toxicology of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
    Pabel, U.
    Woelfle, D.
    Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M.
    Lampen, A.
    JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2008, 3 (03): : 252 - 258
  • [3] A Review of Treatment Technologies for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Water
    Cheng, Juntao
    Huang, Liming
    Li, Yunfeng
    Zhang, Zhen
    Mu, Runzhi
    Liu, Changqing
    Hu, Shuncheng
    Xiao, Yihua
    Xu, Mengchen
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [4] Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Water Environment of Singapore
    Jiangyong Hu
    Jing Yu
    Shuhei Tanaka
    Shigeo Fujii
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2011, 216 : 179 - 191
  • [5] Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in sewage treatment plants
    Yu, Jing
    Hu, Jianyong
    Tanaka, Shuhei
    Fujii, Shigeo
    WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (09) : 2399 - 2408
  • [6] Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Water Environment of Singapore
    Hu, Jiangyong
    Yu, Jing
    Tanaka, Shuhei
    Fujii, Shigeo
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2011, 216 (1-4): : 179 - 191
  • [7] Photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
    Zhang, Pengyi
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [8] Removal of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from water by carbonaceous nanomaterials: A review
    Liu, Longfei
    Liu, Yanli
    Gao, Bin
    Ji, Rong
    Li, Chengliang
    Wang, Shengsen
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 50 (22) : 2379 - 2414
  • [9] Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination from textiles
    Supreeyasunthorn, Phenpimuk
    Boontanon, Suwanna K.
    Boontanon, Narin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 51 (06): : 472 - 477
  • [10] Destruction of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) by Ball Milling
    Zhang, Kunlun
    Huang, Jun
    Yu, Gang
    Zhang, Qiwu
    Deng, Shubo
    Wang, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (12) : 6471 - 6477