The Concept Model of Software Trustworthiness Based on Trust-Theory of Sociology

被引：0

作者：

Yang X. ^{[1
]}

Luo P. ^{[1
]}

Gul J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] The Key Laboratory for Information System Security, Software School, Tsinghua University, Beijing

来源：

Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electronica Sinica | 2019年 / 47卷 / 11期

关键词：

Reliability; Security; Software trustworthiness; STCM; STM; Trust-theory;

D O I：

10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2019.11.016

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

As a complex high-composite software concept, the trustworthiness research has failed to make substantial progress and breakthroughs during these decades.After analyzing the authority definitions of trustworthiness, this paper demonstrates that the scope of them is contradictory and incompatible.It further illustrates that the research of software trustworthiness conceptual model from its essence is very important and necessary.The term "trustworthiness" originates from sociology; so we should discuss the essence of software trustworthiness based on trust-theory of sociology.This paper constructs a trust system model STM based on hundreds of classical sociological literature on trust-theory.After comparing and mapping with software trust system, the paper proposes a software trustworthiness conceptual model STCM based on trust theory of sociology.Based on STM and STCM, a complete concept definition system of software trustworthiness is presented.Finally, STCM is proved to be feasible and effective by the measurement and evaluation experiment, which provides a new research direction for the advancement of software trustworthiness. © 2019, Chinese Institute of Electronics. All right reserved.

引用

页码：2344 / 2353

页数：9

共 17 条

[1]

Department of defense trusted computer system evaluation criteria, (1985)

[2]

Sagasti F.R., Mitroff I.I., Operations research from the viewpoint of general systems theory, OMEGA, 1, 6, pp. 695-709, (1973)

[3]

Singleton R., Straits B.C., Straits M.M., Et al., Approaches to Social Research, (1988)

[4]

Information technology-software product evaluation-Part 1: General overview, (1999)

[5]

Rousseau D.M., Sitkin S.B., Burt R.S., Et al., Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust, The Academy of Management Review, 23, 3, pp. 1-12, (1998)

[6]

Schoorman F.D., Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future, The Academy of Management Review, 32, 2, pp. 344-354, (2007)

[7]

McKnight D.H., Chervany N.L., What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2, pp. 35-59, (2001)

[8]

McKnight D.H., Carter M., Thatcher J.B., Et al., Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures, ACM Transactions on Management Information System, 2, 2, pp. 1-25, (2011)

[9]

Kee H.W., Knox R.E., Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and Suspicion, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 3, pp. 357-366, (1970)

[10]

Lewicki R.J., Bunker B.B., Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships, In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 114-139, (1996)

← 1 2 →