Navigating the uncommon: challenges in applying evidence-based medicine to rare diseases and the prospects of artificial intelligence solutions

被引:2
|
作者
Rennie, Olivia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hist & Philosophy Sci & Technol, 73 Queens Pk Cres, Toronto, ON M5S 1K7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, 1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
关键词
Rare disease; Evidence-based medicine; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Philosophy of medicine; Ethics; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; SAMPLE-SIZE; DESIGNS; BIOMARKERS; STRATEGY; CHILDREN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11019-024-10206-x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The study of rare diseases has long been an area of challenge for medical researchers, with agonizingly slow movement towards improved understanding of pathophysiology and treatments compared with more common illnesses. The push towards evidence-based medicine (EBM), which prioritizes certain types of evidence over others, poses a particular issue when mapped onto rare diseases, which may not be feasibly investigated using the methodologies endorsed by EBM, due to a number of constraints. While other trial designs have been suggested to overcome these limitations (with varying success), perhaps the most recent and enthusiastically adopted is the application of artificial intelligence to rare disease data. This paper critically examines the pitfalls of EBM (and its trial design offshoots) as it pertains to rare diseases, exploring the current landscape of AI as a potential solution to these challenges. This discussion is also taken a step further, providing philosophical commentary on the weaknesses and dangers of AI algorithms applied to rare disease research. While not proposing a singular solution, this article does provide a thoughtful reminder that no 'one-size-fits-all' approach exists in the complex world of rare diseases. We must balance cautious optimism with critical evaluation of new research paradigms and technology, while at the same time not neglecting the ever-important aspect of patient values and preferences, which may be challenging to incorporate into computer-driven models.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 284
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence-Based Medicine and Rare Diseases
    Day, Simon
    RARE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY: UPDATE AND OVERVIEW, 2ND EDITION, 2017, 1031 : 207 - 220
  • [2] The issue of evidence-based medicine and artificial intelligence
    Zhong, Yi
    Lyu, Yan-Ao-Hai
    Yu, Song
    Gao, Yu-jun
    Mi, Wei-Feng
    Li, Jian-Feng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 85
  • [3] Evidence-based Medicine: Applying Valid Evidence
    Onady, Gary M.
    PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2009, 30 (08) : 317 - 322
  • [4] Complexities of evidence-based medicine: Challenges for practice and policy development
    Gilbert, Brian W.
    Turpin, Brittany D. Bissell
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2024,
  • [5] Challenges to delivering evidence-based palliative medicine
    Barry, Caroline
    Paes, Paul
    Noble, Simon
    Davies, Andrew
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 182 - 184
  • [6] Evolution of Hybrid Intelligence and Its Application in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Review
    Bellini, Valentina
    Badino, Marco
    Maffezzoni, Massimo
    Bezzi, Francesca
    Bignami, Elena
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29
  • [7] Evidentiary challenges to evidence-based medicine
    Djulbegovic, B
    Morris, L
    Lyman, GH
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2000, 6 (02) : 99 - 109
  • [8] Evidence-Based Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging
    Streiner, David L.
    Saboury, Babak
    Zukotynski, Katherine A.
    PET CLINICS, 2022, 17 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [9] Applying artificial intelligence to rare diseases: a literature review highlighting lessons from Fabry disease
    Dominique P. Germain
    David Gruson
    Marie Malcles
    Nicolas Garcelon
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 20 (1)
  • [10] The challenges of evidence-based medicine: A philosophical perspective
    Kulkarni A.V.
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2005, 8 (2) : 255 - 260