Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Gossypium hirsutum Fiber Development in Mutant Materials (xin w 139) Provides New Insights into Cotton Fiber Development

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Chunping [1 ]
Zhao, Jieyin [2 ]
Liu, Zhongshan [1 ]
Yang, Yanlong [1 ]
Lai, Chengxia [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Aierxi, Alifu [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Acad Agr Sci, Res Inst Econ Crops, Urumqi 830091, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Agr Univ, Coll Agr, Engn Res Ctr Cotton, Minist Educ, 311 Nongda East Rd, Urumqi 830052, Peoples R China
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
Gossypium hirsutum; mutant; fiber development; RNA-seq; candidate genes; CELL ELONGATION; GENE; GENOME;
D O I
10.3390/plants13081127
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Cotton is the most widely planted fiber crop in the world, and improving cotton fiber quality has long been a research hotspot. The development of cotton fibers is a complex process that includes four consecutive and overlapping stages, and although many studies on cotton fiber development have been reported, most of the studies have been based on cultivars that are promoted in production or based on lines that are used in breeding. Here, we report a phenotypic evaluation of Gossypium hirsutum based on immature fiber mutant (xin w 139) and wild-type (Xin W 139) lines and a comparative transcriptomic study at seven time points during fiber development. The results of the two-year study showed that the fiber length, fiber strength, single-boll weight and lint percentage of xin w 139 were significantly lower than those of Xin W 139, and there were no significant differences in the other traits. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis of the RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data revealed that these seven time points could be clearly divided into three different groups corresponding to the initiation, elongation and secondary cell wall (SCW) synthesis stages of fiber development, and the differences in fiber development between the two lines were mainly due to developmental differences after twenty days post anthesis (DPA). Differential expression analysis revealed a total of 5131 unique differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 290 transcription factors (TFs), between the 2 lines. These DEGs were divided into five clusters. Each cluster functional category was annotated based on the KEGG database, and different clusters could describe different stages of fiber development. In addition, we constructed a gene regulatory network by weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and identified 15 key genes that determined the differences in fiber development between the 2 lines. We also screened seven candidate genes related to cotton fiber development through comparative sequence analysis and qRT-PCR; these genes included three TFs (GH_A08G1821 (bHLH), GH_D05G3074 (Dof), and GH_D13G0161 (C3H)). These results provide a theoretical basis for obtaining an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanism of cotton fiber development and provide new genetic resources for cotton fiber research.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Comparative transcriptional and co-expression network analysis of two upland cotton accessions with extreme phenotypic differences reveals molecular mechanisms of fiber development
    He, Jiasen
    Xu, Zhongyang
    Azhar, Muhammad Tehseen
    Zhang, Zhen
    Li, Pengtao
    Gong, Juwu
    Jiang, Xiao
    Fan, Senmiao
    Ge, Qun
    Yuan, Youlu
    Shang, Haihong
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [42] Transcriptome Analysis of Short Fiber Mutant Ligon lintless-1 (Li1) Reveals Critical Genes and Key Pathways in Cotton Fiber Elongation and Leaf Development
    Liang, Wenhua
    Fang, Lei
    Xiang, Dan
    Hu, Yan
    Feng, Hao
    Chang, Lijing
    Zhang, Tianzhen
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [43] Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals that phosphorylation of sucrose synthase GhSUS2 by Ca2+-dependent protein kinases GhCPK84/93 affects cotton fiber development
    Wang, Yao
    Li, Yu
    Cheng, Fan
    Zhang, Shi-Peng
    Zheng, Yong
    Li, Yang
    Li, Xue-Bao
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2023, 74 (06) : 1836 - 1852