Quality management and competencies in forensic science

被引:3
作者
Neuteboom, Wim [1 ]
Ross, Alastair [2 ]
Bugeja, Lyndal [3 ]
Willis, Sheila [4 ]
Roux, Claude [5 ]
Lothridge, Kevin [6 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Forens Inst, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Victorian Inst Forens Med, Acad Programs, 65 Kavanagh St, Melbourne, Vic 3006, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Dept Forens Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Dundee, Leverhulme Res Ctr Forens Sci, Dundee, Scotland
[5] Univ Technol, Ctr Forens Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Florida Int Univ, Global Forens & Justice Ctr, Largo, FL USA
来源
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS: FORENSIC SCIENCE | 2024年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
assessment; attributes; competencies; forensic science; quality management;
D O I
10.1002/wfs2.1513
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The competencies and attributes of forensic science professionals are a very important pillar of a Quality Management system. However, a recent international survey identified a lack of agreement on the core cognitive competencies required for working in forensic science. The survey also identified the tools for assessing competencies are not necessarily designed to measure cognitive competencies. In this Perspective, we explore further the topic of competencies and in particular, cognitive competencies and attributes with a focus on forensic science professionals. We identify the critical issue and outline a process through which we will seek the views of leaders in the field, both operational and academic, on what the required cognitive competencies and attributes are for forensic science professionals. The tools used will include a questionnaire and direct interviews. Having identified the key competencies and attributes they can then be promoted, and methods developed to assess them within the recruitment process and continuous professional development programs. We argue that further discussion on this topic is warranted as it impacts on forensic science education, training, recruitment, operations, and overall quality. This article is categorized under: Forensic Chemistry and Trace Evidence > Presentation and Evaluation of Forensic Science Output
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
[2]  
Ansari S., 2023, Traits vs competencies: the perplexing question
[3]  
Bain N., 1999, The people advantage, DOI [10.1007/978-1-349-14939-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-14939-1_2]
[4]   Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias [J].
Dror, Itiel E. .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 92 (12) :7998-8004
[5]  
Edupedia, What are cognitive competencies
[6]  
Eskafi F. H., 2016, Cognitive vs. noncognitive assessments: What are they?
[7]   The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge [J].
Evett, Ian .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 370 (1674)
[8]  
Indeed, 2023, Personal attributes: definition, examples and key tips
[9]  
Indeed, 2023, What is technical competence? (Plus 10 Examples of Skills)
[10]   Identifying the critical skillset of top crime scene examiners: Why this matters and why agencies should develop top performers [J].
Kelty, Sally F. ;
Ribaux, Olivier ;
Robertson, James .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS: FORENSIC SCIENCE, 2023,