The effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on the incidence of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Alimoradi, Zainab [1 ]
Kazemi, Farideh [2 ,4 ]
Tiznobeik, Azita [2 ]
Griffiths, Mark D. [3 ]
Masoumi, Seyyedeh Zahra [2 ]
Aghababaei, Soodabeh [2 ]
机构
[1] Qazvin Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Prevent Noncommunicable Dis, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Qazvin, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Mother & Child Care Res Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Nottingham Trent Univ, Psychol Dept, Int Gaming Res Unit, Nottingham, England
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, In Front Mardoms Pk,Shahid Fahmideh Blvd, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
Pregnancy; Risk ratio; Risk difference; Preeclampsia; Vitamin D Supplementation; Meta-analysis; HIGH-RISK; OUTCOMES; CALCIUM; WOMEN; PREVENTION; ASPIRIN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102343
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Introduction: The results of previous studies regarding the effect of vitamin D on the incidence of preeclampsia are inconsistent. Therefore, the primary objective of the present review was to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the risk of preeclampsia. Methods: Five major scientific databases were searched from inception to June 10, 2023. Studies with randomized controlled trial designs were identified. To assess the methodological quality of the selected studies, the Cochrane Tool Checklist (CTC) was used. The random effect model was chosen as a combination model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the standard chi 2 test, and the intensity of heterogeneity was calculated using I2. Effect size indicators including risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated with estimated 95 % confidence intervals. Results: Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review and meta -analysis. The pooled RR of preeclampsia in the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.47 to 0.78; I2=14.4 %; chi 2=23.37; p = 0.27; tau2=0.05), and indicated a 39 % reduction in the risk of preeclampsia. The pooled RD of preeclampsia in the intervention group compared to the control group was -0.03 (95 % CI: -0.05 to -0.01; I2=45.5 %; chi 2=36.68; p = 0.01; tau2=0.0008) and the difference in the risk of preeclampsia among women who received vitamin D supplements was 3 % less than the control group. The NNT was 29 (95 % CI: 20 to 52). Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduces preeclampsia during pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation in pregnancy on risk of pre-eclampsia - Randomized controlled trial [J].
Ali, Aisha Mansoor ;
Alobaid, Abdulaziz ;
Malhis, Tasnim Nidal ;
Khattab, Ahmad Fawzi .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 38 (02) :557-563
[2]   The Effect of Multi mineral-Vitamin D Supplementation on Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women at Risk for Pre-eclampsia [J].
Asemi, Zatollah ;
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 6
[3]   Ataluren and similar compounds (specific therapies for premature termination codon class I mutations) for cystic fibrosis [J].
Aslam, Aisha A. ;
Higgins, Colin ;
Sinha, Ian P. ;
Southern, Kevin W. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (01)
[4]  
August P., 2022, Preeclampsia: Clinical features and diagnosis
[5]  
Azami M, 2017, INT J REPROD BIOMED, V15, P273
[6]   Concept of the Number Needed to Treat for the Analysis of Pain Relief Outcomes in Patients Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation [J].
Bailey-Classen, Ashley ;
Parikh, Amar ;
Adimi, Nima ;
Edgar, Deborah ;
Yan, Alice ;
Rotte, Anand ;
Caraway, David .
BIOMEDICINES, 2022, 10 (02)
[7]  
Bialy L., 2020, BMJ Open, V10
[8]   A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].
Borenstein, Michael ;
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) :97-111
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463