Preparation of Magnetic Iron Oxide/Mulberry Stem Biochar and Its Effects on Dissolved Organic Carbon and Arsenic Speciation in Arsenic-Contaminated Soils

被引：0
作者：
Lu L. [1 ]
Yan L.-L. [1 ]
Liang M.-N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cheng G.-W. [1 ,2 ]
Zhu Z.-Q. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu Y.-N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang D.-Q. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin
[2] Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin
[3] Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin
来源：
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2022年 / 43卷 / 11期
关键词：
arsenic (As); arsenic form; contaminated soil; dissolved organic carbon (DOC); magnetic iron oxide; mulberry stem biochar;
D O I：
10.13227/j.hjkx.202112162
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this study, original mulberry-biochar (M-BC) and magnetic iron oxide/mulberry stem biochar (Fe-BC) materials were prepared and characterized using mulberry stems as the raw material. The effects of carbonized temperature of Fe-BC and M-BC on dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and arsenic (As) speciation in soil leaching solutions were studied using soil incubation experiments. The results showed that: ① Fe-BC was mainly composed of Fe3O4 and was magnetic, and the main functional groups were a C=O double bond, O—H bond, C—O bond, and Fe—O bond. The point of zero charge values (pHzpc) of Fe-BC-400, Fe-BC-500, and Fe-BC-600 were 8.92, 8.74, and 9.19, respectively, and the specific surface areas of Fe-BC-400, Fe-BC-500, and Fe-BC-600 were 447.412, 482.697, and 525.708 m2.g-1, respectively. ② With the increase in the carbonization temperature of M-BC and Fe-BC, the ρ(DOC) of soil leaching solution decreased 11.6- 315.6 mg.L-1 and 78- 365.6 mg.L-1, respectively. The DOC concentration of soil leaching solution was negatively correlated with soil EC. On day 35 of the incubation experiments, compared with that in soil after incubation without biochar (control), the As concentration of the soil leaching solution with Fe-BC-600 decreased by 55.96%, and there was no significant correlation between the As concentration of the soil leaching solution and the DOC concentration of the soil. ③ The available As concentration on day 35 in soil after incubation with Fe-BC was lower than that of the control group; the available As concentration on day 35 in soil incubated with Fe-BC-600 was reduced by 39.21%. ④ The residue As concentration on day 35 in soil incubated with M-BC decreased by 17.76%-49. 11%. The residue As content on day 35 in soil incubated with Fe-BC-600 increased by 80%. Fe-BC-600 was most beneficial to reduce the DOC concentration and the available As content in soil leaching solution and increased the residue As content, thus reducing the bioavailability of soil arsenic. Therefore, this study can provide a theoretical basis for magnetic iron oxide/biochar remediation in arsenic-contaminated soil. © 2022 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：5214 / 5223
页数：9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Mandal B K, Suzuki K T., Arsenic round the world: a review, Talanta, 58, 1, pp. 201-235, (2002)
[2]  
Wang S S, Gao B, Li Y C, Et al., Adsorptive removal of arsenate from aqueous solutions by biochar supported zero-valent iron nanocomposite: batch and continuous flow tests, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 322, (2017)
[3]  
Krysiak A, Karczewska A., Arsenic extractability in soils in the areas of former arsenic mining and smelting, SW Poland [J], Science of the Total Environment, 379, 2-3, pp. 190-200, (2007)
[4]  
Warren G P, Alloway B J, Lepp N W, Et al., Field trials to assess the uptake of arsenic by vegetables from contaminated soils and soil remediation with iron oxides, Science of the Total Environment, 311, 1-3, pp. 19-33, (2003)
[5]  
Leist M, Casey R J, Caridi D., The management of arsenic wastes: problems and prospects, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 76, 1, pp. 125-138, (2000)
[6]  
Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee A B, Jacks G, Et al., Metal contamination at a wood preservation site: characterisation and experimental studies on remediation, Science of the Total Environment, 290, 1-3, pp. 165-180, (2002)
[7]  
Mahimairaja S, Bolan N S, Adriano D C, Et al., Arsenic contamination and its risk management in complex environmental settings, Advances in Agronomy, 86, pp. 1-82, (2005)
[8]  
Mikutta C, Mandaliev P N, Mahler N, Et al., Bioaccessibility of arsenic in mining-impacted circumneutral river floodplain soils [J], Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 22, pp. 13468-13477, (2014)
[9]  
Verheijen F G A, Jeffery S, Bastos A C, Et al., Biochar application to soils-a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions [M], (2010)
[10]  
Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles J L, Et al., A review of biochars′ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils, Environmental Pollution, 159, 12, pp. 3269-3282, (2011)
12345