Ambulatory Risk Stratification for Worsening Heart Failure in Patients with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Diagnostic Parameters Available in Implantable Cardiac Monitors

被引:1
作者
Sarkar, Shantanu [1 ]
Koehler, Jodi [1 ]
Vasudevan, Neethu [1 ]
机构
[1] Medtronic Inc, Moundsview, MN 55112 USA
关键词
risk stratification; implantable cardiac monitors; heart failure; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; INTRATHORACIC IMPEDANCE; DEVICE DIAGNOSTICS; TACHYARRHYTHMIA; MANAGEMENT; BURDEN; HF;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14070771
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ambulatory risk stratification for worsening heart failure (HF) using diagnostics measured by insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) may depend on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We evaluated risk stratification performance in patients with reduced versus preserved LVEF. Methods: ICM patients with a history of HF events (HFEs) were included from the Optum (R) de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset merged with ICM device-collected data during 2007-2021. ICM measures nighttime heart rate (NHR), heart rate variability (HRV), atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, rate during AF, and activity duration (ACT) daily. Each diagnostic was categorized into high, medium, or low risk using previously defined features. HFEs were HF-related inpatient, observation unit, or emergency department stays with IV diuresis administration. Patients were divided into two cohorts: LVEF <= 40% and LVEF > 40%. A marginal Cox proportional hazards model compared HFEs for different risk groups. Results: A total of 1020 ICM patients with 18,383 follow-up months and 301 months with HFEs (1.6%) were included. Monthly evaluations with a high risk were 2.3, 4.2, 5.0, and 4.5 times (p < 0.001 for all) more likely to have HFEs in the next 30 days compared to those with a low risk for AF, ACT, NHR, and HRV, respectively. HFE rates were higher for patients with LVEF > 40% compared to LVEF <= 40% (2.0% vs. 1.3%), and the relative risk between high-risk and low-risk for each diagnostic parameter was higher for patients with LVEF <= 40%. Conclusions: Diagnostics measured by ICM identified patients at risk for impending HFEs. Patients with preserved LVEF showed a higher absolute risk, and the relative risk between risk groups was higher in patients with reduced LVEF.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Abraham William T, 2011, Congest Heart Fail, V17, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00220.x
  • [2] Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial
    Abraham, William T.
    Adamson, Philip B.
    Bourge, Robert C.
    Aaron, Mark F.
    Costanzo, Maria Rosa
    Stevenson, Lynne W.
    Strickland, Warren
    Neelagaru, Suresh
    Raval, Nirav
    Krueger, Steven
    Weiner, Stanislav
    Shavelle, David
    Jeffries, Bradley
    Yadav, Jay S.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 377 (9766) : 658 - 666
  • [3] Continuous autonomic assessment in patients with symptomatic heart failure - Prognostic value of heart rate variability measured by an implanted cardiac resynchronization device
    Adamson, PB
    Smith, AL
    Abraham, WT
    Kleckner, KJ
    Stadler, RW
    Shih, A
    Rhodes, MM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (16) : 2389 - 2394
  • [4] Real-world comparison of in-hospital Reveal LINQ insertable cardiac monitor insertion inside and outside of the cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology laboratory
    Beinart, Sean C.
    Natale, Andrea
    Verma, Atul
    Amin, Alpesh
    Kasner, Scott
    Diener, Hans-Cristoph
    Del Greco, Maurizio
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Pouliot, Erika
    Franco, Noreli
    Mittal, Suneet
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 207 : 76 - 82
  • [5] Benjamin EJ, 2017, CIRCULATION, V135, pE146, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000530]
  • [6] A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted Devices Results From the MultiSENSE Study
    Boehmer, John P.
    Hariharan, Ramesh
    Devecchi, Fausto G.
    Smith, Andrew L.
    Molon, Giulio
    Capucci, Alessandro
    An, Qi
    Averina, Viktoria
    Stolen, Craig M.
    Thakur, Pramodsingh H.
    Thompson, Julie A.
    Wariar, Ramesh
    Zhang, Yi
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2017, 5 (03) : 216 - 225
  • [7] Incidence and clinical relevance of uncontrolled ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Gasparini, Maurizio
    Landolina, Maurizio
    Lunati, Maurizio
    Proclemer, Alessandro
    Lonardi, Gabriele
    Iacopino, Saverio
    Rahue, Werner
    Biffi, Mauro
    DiStefano, Paola
    Grammatico, Andrea
    Santini, Massimo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2011, 13 (08) : 868 - 876
  • [8] The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (09) : 507 - 515
  • [9] Improved arrhythmia detection in implantable loop recorders
    Brignole, Michele
    Black, Carissa L. Bellardine
    Thomsen, Poul E. Bloch
    Sutton, Richard
    Moya, Angel
    Stadler, Robert W.
    Cao, Jian
    Messier, Marc
    Huikuri, Heikki V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (09) : 928 - 934
  • [10] Temporal Association of Atrial Fibrillation With Cardiac Implanted Electronic Device Detected Heart Failure Status
    Capucci, Alessandro
    Wong, Jorge A.
    Gold, Michael R.
    Boehmer, John
    Ahmed, Rezwan
    Kwan, Brian
    Thakur, Pramodsingh H.
    Zhang, Yi
    Jones, Paul W.
    Healey, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 8 (02) : 182 - 193