Expanding Collaborative Moral Injury Research: Reflection on Moral, Contextual, Social, and Psychospiritual Models

被引：0

作者：

Timothy J. Usset ^{[1
]}

Erika Gray ^{[2
]}

Susannah Robb Kondrath ^{[3
]}

Adam P. McGuire ^{[1
]}

Tine Molendijk ^{[4
]}

Rebecca Hiltner ^{[5
]}

Elizabeth A. Bagioni Brandt ^{[6
]}

Kristin B. Golden ^{[7
]}

Andrew J. Smith ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, ME

[2] School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

[3] Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD

[4] University of Maine – Institute of Medicine, Orono, ME

[5] VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research On Returning War Veterans, Waco, TX

[6] Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX

[7] Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX

[8] Faculty of Military Sciences, Netherlands Defense Academy, Breda

[9] Radboud University, Nijmegen

[10] Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH

[11] Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

[12] Lyda Hill Institute for Human Resilience, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO

来源：

Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry | 2024年 / 11卷 / 3期

关键词：

Contextual models; Interdisciplinary collaboration; Moral elevation; Moral injury; Psychospiritual development; Trauma care;

D O I：

10.1007/s40501-024-00328-7

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose of Review: Moral injury has garnered increased empirical and societal interest in the past fifteen years. We sought to conduct a multidisciplinary examination of several developmental, contextual, and relational models of moral injury to better inform professional research and practice. Findings: There are numerous models of moral injury with theoretical and empirical merit. Keeping intervention design grounded in elements of contextual, relational, moral, and psychospiritual developmental theory will be crucial for moral injury interventions to remain relevant. Further bench and applied research is indicated to better understand and develop a holistic understanding of moral injury. Summary: Broad and diverse theories have been developed to explain experiences of potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and sequalae of negative thoughts and beliefs that follow them. Efforts to care for individuals at the intersection of PMIE and trauma exposure needs to remain grounded in interdisciplinary collaboration and multiple theoretical constructs. © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024.

引用

页码：177 / 187

页数：10

共 89 条

[1]

Litz B.T., Stein N., Delaney E., Lebowitz L., Nash W.P., Silva C., Et al., Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy, Clin Psychol Rev, 29, 8, pp. 695-706, (2009)

[2]

Kohlberg L., Hersh R.H., Moral development: A review of the theory, Theory Pract, 16, 2, pp. 53-59, (1977)

[3]

Killen M., Mulvey K.L., Richardson C., Jampol N., Woodward A., The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind, Cognition, 119, 2, pp. 197-215, (2011)

[4]

Bronfenbrenner U., Toward an experimental ecology of human development, Am Psychol, 32, 7, pp. 513-531, (1977)

[5]

Fowler J.W., Faith development theory and the postmodern challenges, Int J Psychol Relig, 11, 3, pp. 159-172, (2001)

[6]

Benight C.C., Shoji K., Delahanty D.L., Self-regulation shift theory: A dynamic systems approach to traumatic stress, J Trauma Stress, 30, 4, pp. 333-342, (2017)

[7]

Benight C.C., Harwell A., Shoji K., Self-regulation shift theory: A dynamic personal agency approach to recovery capital and methodological suggestions, Front Psychol, 9, (2018)

[8]

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (2013)

[9]

Maguen S., Griffin B.J., Copeland L.A., Perkins D.F., Finley E.P., Vogt D., Gender differences in prevalence and outcomes of exposure to potentially morally injurious events among post-9/11 veterans, J Psychiatr Res, 130, pp. 97-103, (2020)

[10]

Hofmann S.G., Hayes S.C., The future of intervention science: process-based therapy, Clin Psychol Sci, 7, 1, pp. 37-50, (2019)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →