All STEM students should learn inclusive science communication

被引：3

作者：

Kelp, Nicole C. ^{[1
]}

Anderson, Ashley A. ^{[2
]}

Enyinnaya, Joy C. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Pathol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA

[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Journalism & Media Commun, Ft Collins, CO USA

[3] Univ Frasier Valley, Sch Commun, Abbotsford, BC, Canada

来源：

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR | 2024年 / 8卷 / 07期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

SCIENTISTS;

D O I：

10.1038/s41562-024-01918-4

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Science communication often assumes a 'deficit' in knowledge on behalf of the recipient, but this deficit-based approach is inequitable and ineffective. We must train all STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) students in inclusive science communication, which uses collaboration with diverse people to address misinformation and solve socioscientific issues.

引用

页码：1232 / 1235

页数：4

共 10 条

[1] Inclusive Science Communication training for first-year STEM students promotes their identity and self-efficacy as scientists and science communicators [J].

Alderfer, Sydney ;

Mcmillan, Rachel ;

Murphy, Katlyn ;

Kelp, Nicole .

FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8

[2] What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate [J].

Besley, John C. ;

Tanner, Andrea H. .

SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2011, 33 (02) :239-263

[3] Science Communication Demands a Critical Approach That Centers Inclusion, Equity, and Intersectionality [J].

Canfield, Katherine N. ;

Menezes, Sunshine ;

Matsuda, Shayle B. ;

Moore, Amelia ;

Austin, Alycia N. Mosley ;

Dewsbury, Bryan M. ;

Feliu-Mojer, Monica, I ;

McDuffie, Katharine W. B. ;

Moore, Kendall ;

Reich, Christine A. ;

Smith, Hollie M. ;

Taylor, Cynthia .

FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2020, 5

[4] Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation [J].

Choi, Sera ;

Anderson, Ashley A. ;

Cagle, Shelby ;

Long, Marilee ;

Kelp, Nicole .

PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08)

[5] Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science Implications for Science Education [J].

Covitt, Beth A. ;

Anderson, Charles W. .

SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2022, 31 (05) :1155-1180

[6] A Systematic Map of Inclusion, Equity and Diversity in Science Communication Research: Do We Practice what We Preach? [J].

Judd, Karina ;

McKinnon, Merryn .

FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2021, 6

[7] Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge [J].

Nogueira, Leticia Antunes ;

Bjorkan, Maiken ;

Dale, Brigt .

FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9

[8] Talking Science: Undergraduates' Everyday Conversations as Acts of Boundary Spanning That Connect Science to Local Communities [J].

Shah, Hana ;

Simeon, Josue ;

Fisher, Kathleen Quardokus ;

Eddy, Sarah L. .

CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2022, 21 (01)

[9] The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? [J].

Simis, Molly J. ;

Madden, Haley ;

Cacciatore, Michael A. ;

Yeo, Sara K. .

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (04) :400-414

[10] Analysis of Inclusivity of Published Science Communication Curricula for Scientists and STEM Students [J].

Vickery, Randy ;

Murphy, Katlyn ;

McMillan, Rachel ;

Alderfer, Sydney ;

Donkoh, Jasmine ;

Kelp, Nicole .

CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2023, 22 (01)

← 1 →