A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization

被引:4
作者
Liu, Yong-Jun [1 ]
Yang, Guo-Sen [1 ]
Zhang, Wei-Guo [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510641, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Management, Shenzhen 518071, Peoples R China
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2024年 / 126卷
关键词
Energy stock portfolio; Real features; Dynamic performance evaluation; DEA cross-efficiency; Regret theory; CONDITIONAL VALUE; DECISION-MAKING; RADIAL MEASURE; NEGATIVE DATA; PERFORMANCE; DEA; RISK; OUTPUTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2024.103051
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
As climate change intensifies, more and more people realize that it is necessary and urgent to optimize energy structure through constructing energy asset portfolios. However, most of existing literature on energy asset portfolio models neglects real market restrictions, and the related portfolio performance evaluation approaches ignore the impact of the psychological factors of decision makers (DMs) on evaluation results, which limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, we first present a mean-WMCVaR (MWMC) model for energy stock portfolio selection with real features. Then, we employ the proposed MWMC model and its closely related works to yield a set of investment schemes and determine their characteristic index values including mean, WMCVaR, carbon intensity and ESG. Subsequently, we present a novel regret -rejoice cross -efficiency (NRRCE) approach to evaluate the performance of these investment schemes, and then make a comparison with the ones of the other seven competitive evaluation approaches by using an empirical example. Empirical results show that the proposed MWMC model can yield an optimal investment scheme with a better trade-off between economic and ecological benefits, and our NRRCE approach can effectively provide reasonable and reliable evaluation results for different investment schemes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Hedging Climate Risk
    Andersson, Mats
    Bolton, Patrick
    Samama, Frederic
    [J]. FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2016, 72 (03) : 13 - 32
  • [2] Scopes of carbon emissions and their impact on green portfolios
    Anquetin, Theophile
    Coqueret, Guillaume
    Tavin, Bertrand
    Welgryn, Lou
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2022, 115
  • [3] Aswani J, 2024, Rev Financ, V28, P107
  • [4] Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty
    Avramov, Doron
    Cheng, Si
    Lioui, Abraham
    Tarelli, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 145 (02) : 642 - 664
  • [6] REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    BELL, DE
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) : 961 - 981
  • [7] Blitz D, 2020, J Portf Manag, V48, P121
  • [8] Global Pricing of Carbon-Transition Risk
    Bolton, Patrick
    Kacperczyk, Marcin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023, 78 (06) : 3677 - 3754
  • [9] Do investors care about carbon risk?
    Bolton, Patrick
    Kacperczyk, Marcin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 142 (02) : 517 - 549
  • [10] The short-term impact on emissions and federal tax revenue of a carbon tax in the US electricity sector
    Carroll, Deborah A.
    Stevens, Kelly A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 158