Global Cyber Security Research Output (1998–2019): A Scientometric Analysis

被引：13

作者：

Dhawan S.M. ^{[1
]}

Gupta B.M. ^{[2
]}

Elango B. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Formerly with Library, CSIR-NPL, New Delhi

[2] Formerly with CSIR-NISTADS, New Delhi

[3] Library, IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram

来源：

Science and Technology Libraries | 2021年 / 40卷 / 02期

关键词：

Bibliometrics; cybersecurity; global publications; Scientometrics;

D O I：

10.1080/0194262X.2020.1840487

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The main aim of this paper is to analyze the global cyber security literature and to discover underlying trends and developments at the global, national, institutional, and individual level using bibliometric indicators. The publications and citations data for the study were sourced from the SCOPUS database published during 1998–2019. Over this period of 22 years, cyber security research registered a 46.41% growth with an average citation impact of 5.05 citations per paper. Nearly 15% of the total papers were funded by external agencies. The top 10 countries alone accounted for the bulk (76.52%) of output in the subject. The United States leads this list with the highest publication productivity (43.75% of global output). Canada leads the world in terms of relative citation index (1.47). International collaboration has been a major driver of growth in cyber security research. The paper lists most productive organizations, authors, and journals. © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

引用

页码：172 / 189

页数：17

共 15 条

[1]

Cyber security market outlook–2025, (2020)

[2]

Cyber research areas of interest, (2020)

[3]

Aunger C., Cyber security is not necessarily a technology issue, (2019)

[4]

Cojocaru I., Cojocaru I., A bibliomeric analysis of cybersecurity research papers in Eastern Europe: Case study from the republic of moldova, Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days, pp. 151-162, (2019)

[5]

Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., Pappas G., Comparison of PubMed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses, The FASEB Journal, 22, 2, pp. 338-342, (2008)

[6]

Garg D., Sidhu J., Rani S., Emerging trends in cloud computing security: A bibliometric analyses, IET Software, 13, 3, pp. 223-231, (2019)

[7]

Jalali M.S., Razak S., Gordon W., Perakslis E., Madnick S., Health care and cybersecurity: Bibliometric analysis of the literature, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21, 2, (2019)

[8]

Kumari G.L., Synthetic organic chemistry research: Analysis by scientometric indicators, Scientometrics, 80, 3, pp. 559-570, (2009)

[9]

Makawana P.R., Jhaveri R.H., A bibliometric analysis of recent research on machine learning for cyber security, Intelligent communication and computational technologies, pp. 213-226, (2018)

[10]

Mandani A., Ramirez R., Cybersecurity: Current state of governance literature, Proceedings of the 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2019), pp. 1-9, (2019)

← 1 2 →