Predictive value of drain fluid amylase level on postoperative day one after pancreatic resection for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula

被引:1
作者
Buyukkasap, Ahmet Cagri [1 ]
Dikmen, Kursat [1 ]
Yavuz, Aydin [1 ]
Altiner, Saygin [1 ]
Gobut, Huseyin [1 ]
Emral, Ahmet Cihangir [1 ]
Bostanci, Hasan [1 ]
Kerem, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Pancreaticoduodenectomy; amylases; postoperative complications; pancreatic fistula; RISK; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; SURGERY; LEAKAGE;
D O I
10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6292
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the first postoperative day (POD1) drain fluid amylase in predicting pancreatic fistula formation following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Material and Methods: One-hundred and eighty-five prospective patients undergoing PD between April 2014 and April 2018 were studied retrospectively. Cut-off point to predict the development of POPF was determined by median values for drain fluid amylase of 1883 U/L. Patients were classified into two groups according to POD1 drain fluid amylase values: >= 1883 U/L (Group 1) and =1883 U/L (Group 2). Differences between the groups with clinically relevant POPF and without POPF were evaluated. Results: The incidence of POPF was 17.2%. POD1 amylase level was the strongest predictor of POPF, with levels of higher than 1883 U/L demonstrating the best accuracy (87.5%), sensitivity (78.1%), specificity (89.5%), positive predictive value (60.9%), and negative predictive value (95.1%). One-hundred and forty-four patients (77.8%) had a POD1 drain amylase level of less than 1883 U/L, and POPF developed in only seven (3.7%) cases, whereas in patients with POD1 drain amylase level of 1883 U/L or higher (n= 41), the POPF rate was 31.4% [OR: 22.24, 95% CI (7.930-62.396), p< 0.001]. Conclusion: The cut-off point of POD1 drain fluid amylase level (1883 U/L) might predict the clinically relevant POPF with adequate sensitivity and specificity rates in patients undergoing pancreatic resection.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Ansorge, C.
    Nordin, J. Z.
    Lundell, L.
    Strommer, L.
    Rangelova, E.
    Blomberg, J.
    del Chiaro, M.
    Segersvard, R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (02) : 100 - 108
  • [2] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
    Bassi, Claudio
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Dervenis, Christos
    Sarr, Micheal
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Adham, Mustapha
    Allen, Peter
    Andersson, Roland
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Falconi, Massimo
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Izbicki, Jakob
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Olah, Attila
    Schulick, Richard
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vollmer, Charles
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Salvia, Roberto
    Buehler, Marcus
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [3] Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bassi, Claudio
    Molinari, Enrico
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Crippa, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Talamini, Giorgio
    Pederzoli, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [4] Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection
    Conlon, KC
    Labow, D
    Leung, D
    Smith, A
    Jarnagin, W
    Coit, DG
    Merchant, N
    Brennan, MF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) : 487 - 493
  • [5] Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy
    de Castro, SMM
    Busch, ORC
    van Gulik, TM
    Obertop, H
    Gouma, DJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (09) : 1117 - 1123
  • [6] Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence
    Diener, Markus K.
    Mehr, Keyvan-Tadjalli
    Wente, Moritz N.
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (01) : 41 - 52
  • [7] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [8] Pancreatic Anastomotic Leakage after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, Clinical predictors, and Management (Single Center Experience)
    El Nakeeb, Ayman
    Salah, Tarek
    Sultan, Ahmad
    El Hemaly, Mohamed
    Askr, Waleed
    Ezzat, Helmy
    Hamdy, Emad
    Atef, Ehab
    El Hanafy, Ehab
    El-Geidie, Ahmed
    Wahab, Mohamed Abdel
    Abdallah, Talaat
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) : 1405 - 1418
  • [9] Diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula
    Facy, O.
    Chalumeau, C.
    Poussier, M.
    Binquet, C.
    Rat, P.
    Ortega-Deballon, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (08) : 1072 - 1075
  • [10] Pancreatic resection without routine intraperitoneal drainage
    Fisher, William E.
    Hodges, Sally E.
    Silberfein, Eric J.
    Artinyan, Avo
    Ahern, Charlotte H.
    Jo, Eunji
    Brunicardi, F. Charles
    [J]. HPB, 2011, 13 (07) : 503 - 510