Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status

被引:0
|
作者
Albi, Cecilia [1 ,2 ]
Ciorba, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Bianchini, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Cammaroto, Giovanni [3 ]
Pelucchi, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Sgarzani, Rossella [4 ]
Gessaroli, Manlio [5 ]
De Vito, Andrea [3 ]
Vicini, Claudio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meccariello, Giuseppe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ferrara, ENT, Viaaldo Moro 8, I-44124 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Ferrara, Dept Neurosci, Audiol Unit, Viaaldo Moro 8, I-44124 Ferrara, Italy
[3] Morgagni Pierantoni Hosp, ENT Unit, Azienda USL Romagna, Forli, Forli Cesena, Italy
[4] Maurizio Bufalini Hosp, Ctr Major Burns, Unit Plast Surg, Cesena, Forli Cesena, Italy
[5] Maurizio Bufalini Hosp, Unit Maxillofacial Surg, Cesena, Forli Cesena, Italy
来源
关键词
Oropharyngeal neoplasms; Robotic surgical procedures; Human papilloma viruses; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; RESECTION; HEAD; FEASIBILITY; THERAPY; SALVAGE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10235-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search of English -language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta -Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease -free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 353
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transoral Robotic Surgery Alone for Oropharyngeal Cancer An Analysis of Local Control
    Weinstein, Gregory S.
    Quon, Harry
    Newman, H. Jason
    Chalian, J. Ara
    Malloy, Kelly
    Lin, Alexander
    Desai, Arati
    Livolsi, Virginia A.
    Montone, Kathleen T.
    Cohen, K. Roger
    O'Malley, Bert W., Jr.
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2012, 138 (07) : 628 - 634
  • [32] Outcome of transoral robotic surgery for stage I–II oropharyngeal cancer
    J. W. L. van Loon
    L. E. Smeele
    F. J. M. Hilgers
    M. W. M. van den Brekel
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2015, 272 : 175 - 183
  • [33] Transoral robotic surgery in HPV plus oropharyngeal cancer of unknown primary
    Roman, Kelsey M.
    Nguyen, Cecilia
    Torabi, Sina J.
    Berger, Michael H.
    Kuan, Edward C.
    Tjoa, Tjoson
    Haidar, Yarah M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 45 (01)
  • [34] Early postoperative functional outcomes following transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review
    Stephen, Sarah E.
    Murphy, Jennifer M.
    Beyer, Fiona R.
    Sellstrom, Diane
    Paleri, Vinidh
    Patterson, Joanne M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (02): : 530 - 547
  • [35] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Eagle Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Keirns, Darby
    Asarkar, Ameya
    Entezami, Payam
    Ware, Erin
    Nagel, Thomas H.
    Chang, Brent A.
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [36] Reconstruction following transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: Systematic review
    Barrette, Louis-Xavier
    De Ravin, Emma
    Carey, Ryan M.
    Mady, Leila J.
    Cannady, Steven B.
    Brody, Robert M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (05): : 1246 - 1254
  • [37] Protocol for the systematic review of the reporting of transoral robotic surgery
    Main, Barry G.
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Howes, Noah
    Cousins, Sian
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Gormley, Alexander
    Radford, Phil
    Elliott, Daisy
    Byrne, Benjamin
    Wilson, Nicholas
    Hinchliffe, Robert
    Blazebyl, Jane M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [38] Velopharyngeal incompetence following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A scoping review
    Charters, Emma
    Pelham, Claire
    Novakovic, Daniel
    Madill, Cate
    Clark, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2023, 25 (04) : 540 - 548
  • [39] Do We Have Enough Evidence to Specifically Recommend Transoral Robotic Surgery in HPV-Driven Oropharyngeal Cancer? A Systematic Review
    De Virgilio, Armando
    Costantino, Andrea
    Rizzo, Davide
    Crescio, Claudia
    Gallus, Roberto
    Spriano, Giuseppe
    Mercante, Giuseppe
    Festa, Bianca Maria
    Accorona, Remo
    Pignataro, Lorenzo
    Capaccio, Pasquale
    Bussu, Francesco
    PATHOGENS, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [40] Transoral robotic surgery vs. radiotherapy for management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma - A systematic review of the literature
    Yeh, D. H.
    Tam, S.
    Fung, K.
    MacNeil, S. D.
    Yoo, J.
    Winquist, E.
    Palma, D. A.
    Nichols, A. C.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (12): : 1603 - 1614