Quantifying the quantumness of pure-state ensembles via coherence of Gram matrix

被引:1
作者
Fan, Yajing [1 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ]
机构
[1] North Minzu Univ, Sch Math & Informat Sci, Yinchuan 750021, Peoples R China
关键词
Gram matrix; Hilbert-Schmidt distance; Skew information; Coherence; INFORMATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISTINGUISHABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129506
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The Gram matrix of a set of pure states plays a crucial role in exploring the information content of quantum states. Since the Gram matrix of a pure-state ensemble can be regarded as a quantum state, we can quantify the quantumness of the corresponding quantum ensemble by means of the coherence of the Gram matrix. In particular, we introduce two natural measures of quantumness of an ensemble by means of the coherence of the Gram matrix based on Hilbert-Schmidt distance and skew information, respectively, and investigate their fundamental properties. In addition, notice that the average coherence and the maximum coherence are independent of the choice of a reference basis, we further propose to use the average coherence and the maximum coherence of the Gram matrix to quantify the generalized quantumness of the corresponding ensemble, and find that the generalized quantumness is not only related to the quantum states in the ensemble, but also to the probability distribution. We discuss the validity of these quantumness measures by calculating some important pure-state ensembles in quantum measurement and quantum cryptography. Finally, we compare these quantifiers with other existing quantifiers in the literatures and illustrate that different quantifiers can yield different features and quantumness orderings for quantum ensembles.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Decomposition results for Gram matrix determinants [J].
Banica, Teodor ;
Curran, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 51 (11)
[2]   Quantifying Coherence [J].
Baumgratz, T. ;
Cramer, M. ;
Plenio, M. B. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2014, 113 (14)
[3]   Incoherent and coherent eavesdropping in the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography [J].
Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H ;
Gisin, N .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1999, 59 (06) :4238-4248
[4]   QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY USING ANY 2 NONORTHOGONAL STATES [J].
BENNETT, CH .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1992, 68 (21) :3121-3124
[5]   Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing [J].
Bennett, Charles H. ;
Brassard, Gilles .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2014, 560 :7-11
[6]   Strong Unitary and Overlap Uncertainty Relations: Theory and Experiment [J].
Bong, Kok-Wei ;
Tischler, Nora ;
Patel, Raj B. ;
Wollmann, Sabine ;
Pryde, Geoff J. ;
Hall, Michael J. W. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2018, 120 (23)
[7]  
Brukner C, 1999, PHYS REV LETT, V83, P3354, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3354
[8]  
Brukner C, 2001, PHYS REV A, V63, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022113
[9]   Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states [J].
Bruss, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (14) :3018-3021
[10]   Superposition Quantification [J].
Chang, Li-Na ;
Luo, Shun-Long ;
Sun, Yuan .
COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 68 (05) :565-570