Comparison of Windup and Stretch Pitching Biomechanics in Baseball With Implications for Safety and Performance

被引:0
|
作者
Fleisig, Glenn S. [1 ]
Slowik, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Kutz, Charles B. [2 ]
Escamilla, Rafael F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Sports Med Inst, 833 St Vincents Dr, Suite 101, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA
[2] Middlebury Coll, Middlebury, VT USA
[3] Calif State Univ, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
fastball velocity; elbow; shoulder; injury; kinematics; kinetics; timing; FASTBALL;
D O I
10.1177/03635465241247543
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Historically, it was assumed by some that high leg lift with windup pitching generated more ball velocity whereas pitching from the stretch was quicker to reduce the risk of base stealing but also more stressful on the arm. However, many now believe that velocity and stress do not differ between windup and stretch and always pitching from the stretch is simpler than mastering 2 techniques. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare windup and stretch fastball pitching biomechanics. It was hypothesized that there would be statistically significant and clinically important differences in ball velocity, timing of angular velocities, joint kinetics, and pitching kinematics. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fastball pitching biomechanics previously captured for 221 healthy baseball pitchers (105 professional, 52 collegiate, and 64 high school level) were analyzed. For each pitcher, data for 3 to 10 windup trials and 3 to 10 stretch trials were available. Ball velocity was recorded using a radar gun. A 12-camera, 240-Hz automated motion capture system was used to track 39 reflective markers attached to the pitcher. A total of 24 kinematic parameters, 4 temporal parameters, and 5 kinetic parameters were calculated. Data for each parameter were compared across the 2 techniques and 3 competition levels using 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P < .01). Based on previous studies and the expertise of the investigators, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was set as 2 degrees for angle measurements, 20 deg/s for angular velocities, 0.5 m/s for fastball velocity, and 0.3% body height x weight for normalized joint torque. Results: Fastball velocity was statistically greater from the windup than stretch for the collegiate subgroup but not for the other 2 levels. The collegiate level difference was below the MCID. Pitching from the windup generated greater front knee height and required more time from initiation of leg lift to front foot contact. From foot contact to ball release, there were 11 additional small, statistically significant differences between windup and stretch; however, each of these was well below the MCID. Conclusion: Pitching from the stretch was quicker and should be used with runners on base to prevent stealing. Pitching from the windup and stretch produced similar ball velocity, joint kinetics, and kinematics. Thus, pitchers may choose to use both techniques or stretch only based on comfort and personal preference. Clinical Relevance: The decision to pitch from both the windup and stretch or only from the stretch should not affect a pitcher's performance or joint stress (and injury risk).
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1675
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Individual factors associated with baseball pitching performance: scoping review
    Mercier, Marie-Andree
    Tremblay, Mathieu
    Daneau, Catherine
    Descarreaux, Martin
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [32] Biomechanical comparison of the fastball from wind-up and the fastball from stretch in professional baseball pitchers
    Dun, Shouchen
    Kingsley, David
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    Loftice, Jeremy
    Andrews, James R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (01) : 137 - 141
  • [33] Analysis of Injuries and Pitching Performance Between Major League Baseball and Nippon Professional Baseball: A 2-Team Comparison Between 2015 to 2019
    Crotin, Ryan L.
    Yanai, Toshimasa
    Chalmers, Peter
    Smale, Kenneth B.
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Kaneoka, Koji
    Ishii, Masaya
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [34] Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development
    Fleisig, GS
    Barrentine, SW
    Zheng, N
    Escamilla, RF
    Andrews, JR
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (12) : 1371 - 1375
  • [35] Differences among fastball, curveball, and change-up pitching biomechanics across various levels of baseball
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    Laughlin, Walter A.
    Aune, Kyle T.
    Cain, E. Lyle
    Dugas, Jeffrey R.
    Andrews, James R.
    SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 15 (02) : 128 - 138
  • [36] Shoulder External Over Internal Rotation Ratio Is Related to Biomechanics in Collegiate Baseball Pitching
    Stokes, Hannah L.
    Eaton, Koco
    Zheng, Naiquan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 40 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [37] Biomechanics of windmill softball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms at the shoulder and elbow
    Barrentine, SW
    Fleisig, GS
    Whiteside, JA
    Escamilla, RF
    Andrews, JR
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 28 (06) : 405 - 414
  • [38] Pitching mechanics and performance of adult baseball pitchers: A systematic review and meta-analysis for normative data
    Mine, Koya
    Milanese, Steve
    Jones, Mark Alan
    Saunders, Steve
    Onofrio, Ben
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2023, 26 (JAN) : 69 - 76
  • [40] Differences Among Overhand, 3-Quarter, and Sidearm Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Players
    Escamilla, Rafael F.
    Slowik, Jonathan S.
    Diffendaffer, Alek Z.
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 34 (05) : 377 - 385