Assessing student learning in work-integrated learning (WIL): A systematic review on assessment methods and purposes

被引:2
作者
Luk, Lillian Yun Yung [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Cecilia K. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Teaching & Learning Innovat Ctr TALIC, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, CPD1-73,1-F,Centennial Campus,Jockey Club Tower, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Assessment; Work -integrated learning; Higher education; Self -regulated learning; Lifelong learning; PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK TOOLS; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL-WORK; PRACTICUM COMPETENCES; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT DESIGN; FIELD PRACTICUM; PLACEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101345
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Under increasing pressure from quality assurance and other accountability concerns, it is easy to fall into the trap of assessing students only for the sake of assessment. This review aims to help educators rethink assessment in work-integrated learning (WIL) courses with purpose in mind by identifying the assessment methods used to assess student learning in such courses over the last 20 years, together with the underlying purposes of assessment. Based on the analysis of 103 selected articles from four databases and additional searching, 22 assessment methods and seven broad categories of assessment purposes were identified. One key finding is that the assessment of student learning in WIL courses outlined in the results was mainly implemented as assessment for learning to support students' development as self-regulated, lifelong learners. Based on this finding, we propose three assessment design principles for self-regulated learning with recommendations on how to utilize different assessment methods to their fullest potential in preparing students for their futures.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]   Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: the challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context [J].
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Tai, Joanna ;
Tran Le Huu Nghia ;
Boud, David ;
Johnson, Liz ;
Patrick, Carol-Joy .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (02) :304-316
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings
[3]   Confidence and gender differences within a work-integrated learning programme: evidence from a UK higher education institution [J].
Arsenis, Panagiotis ;
Flores, Miguel .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 40 (05) :947-963
[4]   Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment [J].
Ashford-Rowe, Kevin ;
Herrington, Janice ;
Brown, Christine .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (02) :205-222
[5]  
Atkinson G., 2016, Work based learning and work integrated learning - fostering engagement with employers
[6]   A Consensus Model: Shifting assessment practices in dietetics tertiary education [J].
Bacon, Rachel ;
Kellett, Jane ;
Dart, Janeane ;
Knight-Agarwal, Cathy ;
Mete, Rebecca ;
Ash, Susan ;
Palermo, Claire .
NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2018, 75 (04) :418-430
[7]  
Bates M., 2003, J CRIM JUSTICE EDUC, V14, P303, DOI DOI 10.1080/10511250300085811
[8]   Assessment of Internship Experiences and Accounting Core Competencies [J].
Beard, Deborah .
ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2007, 16 (02) :207-220
[9]   Support for assessment practice: developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Dawson, Phillip ;
Boud, David ;
Bennett, Sue ;
Hall, Matt ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (05) :545-556
[10]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25