Using extrusion-based 3D printing technology to investigate the impact of changing print conditions on tensile characteristics

被引:3
作者
Viswanath, Vidyut Raghu [1 ]
Hiremath, Shivashankar [1 ,2 ]
Chiniwar, Dundesh S.
机构
[1] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Manipal Inst Technol, Dept Mechatron, Manipal, India
[2] Hanyang Univ, Survivabil Signal Intelligence Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
3D printing; Infill; Raster angle; Orientation; Tensile strength; Sparse double dense; On-edge; ULTEM; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PROCESS PARAMETERS; DEPOSITION; ABS; PC; OPTIMIZATION; PROPERTY; PLA;
D O I
10.1108/RPJ-06-2023-0204
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this study, most recent advancements in threedimensional (3D) printing have focused on the fabrication of components. It is typical to use different print settings, such as raster angle, infill and orientation to improve the 3D component qualities while fabricating the sample using a 3D printer. However, the influence of these factors on the characteristics of the 3D parts has not been well explored. Owing to the effect of the different print parameters in fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology, it is necessary to evaluate the strength of the parts manufactured using 3D printing technology.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the effect of three print parameters - raster angle, build orientation and infill - on the tensile characteristics of 3D-printed components made of three distinct materials - acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA), polycarbonate ABS (PC-ABS) and ULTEM-9085 - was investigated. A variety of test items were created using a commercially accessible 3D printer in various configurations, including raster angle (0 degrees, 45 degrees), (0 degrees, 90 degrees), (45 degrees, -45 degrees), (45 degrees, 90 degrees), infill density (solid, sparse, sparse double dense) and orientation (flat, on-edge).FindingsThe outcome shows that variations in tensile strength and force are brought on by the effects of various printing conditions. In all possible combinations of the print settings, ULTEM 9085 material has a higher tensile strength than ASA and PC-ABS materials. ULTEM 9085 material's on-edge orientation, sparse infill, and raster angle of (0 degrees, -45 degrees) resulted in the greatest overall tensile strength of 73.72 MPa. The highest load-bearing strength of ULTEM material was attained with the same procedure, measuring at 2,932 N. The tensile strength of the materials is higher in the on-edge orientation than in the flat orientation. The tensile strength of all three materials is highest for solid infill with a flat orientation and a raster angle of (45 degrees, -45 degrees). All three materials show higher tensile strength with a raster angle of (45 degrees, -45 degrees) compared to other angles. The sparse double-dense material promotes stronger tensile properties than sparse infill. Thus, the strength of additive components is influenced by the combination of selected print parameters. As a result, these factors interact with one another to produce a high-quality product.Originality/valueThe outcomes of this study can serve as a reference point for researchers, manufacturers and users of 3D-printed polymer material (PC-ABS, ASA, ULTEM 9085) components seeking to optimize FDM printing parameters for tensile strength and/or identify materials suitable for intended tensile characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 999
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance
    Abu Bakar, Nur Saaidah
    Alkahari, Mohd Rizal
    Boejang, Hambali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2010, 11 (12): : 972 - 977
  • [2] Agarwal KM., 2022, Sensors Int, V3, P100149, DOI [10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100149, DOI 10.1016/J.SINTL.2021.100149]
  • [3] Ahmad S., 2023, HDB METROLOGY APPL, P1193, DOI [10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_136, DOI 10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_136]
  • [4] Al Khawaja H., 2020, 2020, P2020, DOI DOI 10.1109/ASET48392.2020.9118307
  • [5] Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: a Design-for-Manufacturing Approach
    Alafaghani, Ala'aldin
    Qattawi, Ala
    Alrawi, Buraaq
    Guzman, Arturo
    [J]. 45TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 45), 2017, 10 : 791 - 803
  • [6] Baich Liseli, 2015, International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, V5, P308
  • [7] Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling
    Bellini, A
    Güçeri, S
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2003, 9 (04) : 252 - 264
  • [8] A new digital chain for additive manufacturing processes
    Bonnard, Renan
    Mognol, Pascal
    Hascoet, Jean-Yves
    [J]. VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2010, 5 (02) : 75 - 88
  • [9] Development of rapid tooling using fused deposition modeling: a review
    Boparai, Kamaljit Singh
    Singh, Rupinder
    Singh, Harwinder
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (02) : 281 - 299
  • [10] Mechanical properties of ULTEM 9085 material processed by fused deposition modeling
    Byberg, Kate Iren
    Gebisa, Aboma Wagari
    Lemu, Hirpa G.
    [J]. POLYMER TESTING, 2018, 72 : 335 - 347