China's Sustainable Energy Transition Path to Low-Carbon Renewable Infrastructure Manufacturing under Green Trade Barriers

被引:10
作者
Tang, Jing [1 ]
Xiao, Xiao [1 ]
Han, Mengqi [1 ]
Shan, Rui [2 ]
Gu, Dungang [1 ]
Hu, Tingting [1 ]
Li, Guanghui [1 ]
Rao, Pinhua [1 ]
Zhang, Nan [3 ]
Lu, Jiaqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Innovat Ctr Environm & Resources, 333 Longteng Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Proc Integrat, Dept Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, England
关键词
green trade barriers; product carbon footprint; renewable infrastructure; decarbonization scenarios; China; international trade transportation; sustainable development; carbon neutrality; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POWER-GENERATION; EMISSIONS; SOLAR; NEED;
D O I
10.3390/su16083387
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Facing green trade barriers from developed nations, particularly the EU, based on product carbon footprints, China's renewable energy industries confront significant challenges in transitioning towards sustainability and low carbon emissions. This study delves into the carbon footprint of China's renewable infrastructure, evaluating wind turbines, photovoltaic (PV) panels, and lithium batteries across varied decarbonization scenarios, emphasizing both production and international trade transportation. The initial findings for 2022 indicate baseline carbon footprints of 990,701 kg CO2-eq/MW for wind turbines, 2994.97 kg CO2-eq/kWp for PV panels, and 67.53 kg CO2-eq/kWh for batteries. Projections for 2050 suggest that decarbonization advancements could slash these footprints by up to 36.1% for wind turbines, 76.7% for PV panels, and 72.5% for batteries, closely mirroring the EU's 2050 low-carbon benchmarks. Considerable carbon footprints from both domestic and international transportation have been quantified, underscoring the importance of logistic decarbonization. Based on these results, it is concluded that China's steadfast commitment to a sustainable and climate-ambitious development path can provide globally competitive, low-carbon renewable infrastructure after 2030. The study advocates for a collaborative approach to product decarbonization across international trade, as opposed to erecting barriers, to effectively contribute to global climate objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   A critical review of sustainable rail technologies based on environmental, economic, social, and technical perspectives to achieve net zero emissions [J].
Ahsan, Nabeel ;
Hewage, Kasun ;
Razi, Faran ;
Hussain, Syed Asad ;
Sadiq, Rehan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 185
[2]   Carbon footprints of solar panels in China provinces based on different production and waste treatment scenarios [J].
An, Miaorui ;
Sun, Xinlu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, DOI DOI 10.3403/30151316.
[4]  
[Anonymous], EVBOX ELECT CAR BATT
[5]  
[Anonymous], LITHIUM ION BATTERIE
[6]  
[Anonymous], JINGSUN 144 HALF CEL
[7]  
[Anonymous], VESTAS V150 42 MEGAW
[8]  
[Anonymous], 36 MW SERIES WIND TU
[9]   Challenges and opportunities in decarbonizing the US energy system [J].
Arent, Douglas J. ;
Green, Peter ;
Abdullah, Zia ;
Barnes, Teresa ;
Bauer, Sage ;
Bernstein, Andrey ;
Berry, Derek ;
Berry, Joe ;
Burrell, Tony ;
Carpenter, Birdie ;
Cochran, Jaquelin ;
Cortright, Randy ;
Curry-Nkansah, Maria ;
Denholm, Paul ;
Gevorian, Vahan ;
Himmel, Michael ;
Livingood, Bill ;
Keyser, Matt ;
King, Jennifer ;
Kroposki, Ben ;
Mai, Trieu ;
Mehos, Mark ;
Muratori, Matteo ;
Narumanchi, Sreekant ;
Pivovar, Bryan ;
Romero-Lankao, Patty ;
Ruth, Mark ;
Stark, Greg ;
Turchi, Craig .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 169
[10]   The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy [J].
Bataille, Chris ;
Waisman, Henri ;
Colombier, Michel ;
Segafredo, Laura ;
Williams, Jim ;
Jotzo, Frank .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 :S7-S26