Static security assessment according to N-1 criterion for transmission lines based on sampled-blind-number

被引：0
作者：
Liu Y. [1 ,2 ]
Peng S. [2 ]
Zhang Z. [2 ]
Xia N. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] Shaanxi Electric Power Research Institute, Xi'an
来源：
Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control | 2019年 / 47卷 / 07期
关键词：
N-1; criterion; Sampled-blind-number (SBN); Static security assessment; Uncertainty;
D O I：
10.7667/PSPC180775
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to research the static security assessment result for transmission lines considering the uncertainty of loads and Distributed Generations (DGs) output power, a Sampled-Blind-Number (SBN) based static security assessment for transmission lines is put forward. Firstly, the sampling method for the static security assessment is described, in which the SBNs of a load and the output power of a DG are calculated from the annual load duration curve and the annual output power duration curve, respectively. The scenarios for analysis are furnished from combining the corresponding SBNs of the loads and DGs output power. On this basis, whether the loading of the other transmission line or grid equipment under the N-1 assessment is over its rated value is analyzed. The probability of being against the N-1 criterion for grid is obtained as the summation of the probabilities of the scenarios which are with overloaded situations. Finally, the transmission lines with risk of being against N-1 criterion are ranked by the probability of risk to find the vulnerable spots of grid. An example is given to explain the proposed approach and the simulation result shows SBN method is feasible for N-1 static assessment and suitable for the multi-dimension evaluation for grid. © 2019, Power System Protection and Control Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：106 / 112
页数：6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] Liu J., Xu J., Dong H., Probabilistic load flow analysis of distribution network and its applications, Power System Technology, 28, 6, pp. 67-70, (2004)
  • [12] Liu Y., Zhang B., Li J., Et al., Probabilistic load flow analysis considering static security risk of power grid, Proceedings of the CSEE, 31, 1, pp. 49-64, (2011)
  • [13] Fu X., Static security preventive control considering uncertainty factors for power system, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 34, 2, pp. 120-124, (2014)
  • [14] Dong L., Zhang C., Yang Y., Et al., Improvement of probabilistic load flow to consider network configuration uncertainties, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, pp. 1-5, (2009)
  • [15] Williams T., Crawford C., Probabilistic load flow modeling comparing maximum entropy and Gram-Charlier probability density function reconstructions, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28, 1, pp. 272-280, (2013)
  • [16] Kloubert M., Rehtanz C., Enhancement to the combination of point estimate method and Gram-Charlier Expansion method for probabilistic load flow computations, Proceedings of IEEE Manchester Power Tech Conference, pp. 1-6, (2017)
  • [17] Deng W., Zhang B., Ding H., Et al., Risk-based probabilistic voltage stability assessment in uncertain power system, Energies, 10, 2, pp. 180-198, (2017)
  • [18] Zhang M., Chen J., Yang X., Et al., Three-phase power flow calculation for micro-grid with volatile wind power, photovoltaic power and load, Proceedings of the CSEE, 33, 13, pp. 101-107, (2013)
  • [19] Marsadek M., Mohamed A., Norpiah Z.M., Et al., Risk of static security assessment of a power system using non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation, Journal of Applied Sciences, 11, 2, pp. 300-307, (2011)
  • [20] Liu K., Wu H., The concept, operation and properties of blind number, Operations Research and Management Science, 7, 3, pp. 14-17, (1998)
123