Evaluation of pressure fluctuations coefficient along the USBR Type II stilling basin using experimental results and AI models

被引:4
作者
Mousavi S.N. [1 ]
Farsadizadeh D. [1 ]
Salmasi F. [1 ]
Hosseinzadeh Dalir A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Water Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz
关键词
Cʹ[!sub]P[!/sub] coefficient; DL model; hydraulic jump; MLP model; stilling basin;
D O I
10.1080/09715010.2020.1743208
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, two artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, including Deep Learning (DL) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), have been applied to predict the pressure fluctuations coefficient (CʹP) along the submerged and free jumps at the bottom of the USBR Type II stilling basin, based on the geometric and hydraulic parameters. This coefficient is significant for evaluating the uplift and cavitation phenomena within the stilling basins. The measurements were conducted in a laboratory flume using the pressure transducers and the data acquisition system. The maximum values of CʹP occurred at the beginning of the stilling basin. The DL algorithm contains three hidden layers using (100,100,100) hidden neurons. The optimal structure for the MLP model was found to be 5–10‒1. In the testing set, using the DL model, the values of determination coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and Legate and McCabe’s Index (LMI) were obtained 0.915, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.743, respectively. For the MLP model, the same values were obtained 0.522, 0.009, 0.007, and 0.199, respectively. It was verified that the DL model gives more accurate results for the CʹP coefficient. © 2020 Indian Society for Hydraulics.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Azamathulla H.M., Gene-expression programming to predict friction factor for Southern Italian Rivers, Neural Comput. Appl., 23, 5, pp. 1421-1426, (2013)
  • [2] Azimi H., Bonakdari H., Ebtehaj I., Gene expression programming-based approach for predicting the roller length of a hydraulic jump on a rough bed, ISH J. Hydraul. Eng., pp. 1-11, (2019)
  • [3] Bengio Y., Learning deep architectures for AI, Found. Trends® Mach. Learn., 2, 1, pp. 1-127, (2009)
  • [4] Candel A., Parmar V., LeDell E., Arora A., Deep learning with H2O, (2018)
  • [5] Chai T., Draxler R.R., Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, pp. 1247-1250, (2014)
  • [6] Chanson H., Carvalho R.F., Hydraulic jumps and stilling basins, Energy dissipation in hydraulic structures, pp. 65-104, (2015)
  • [7] Endres L.A.M., Contribution to development a system for acquisition and processing of instantaneous pressure data in laboratory, Master thesis, (1990)
  • [8] Farhoudi F., Sadat-Helbar S.M., Aziz N., Pressure fluctuation around chute blocks of SAF Stilling basins, J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 12, pp. 203-212, (2010)
  • [9] Fiorotto V., Rinaldo A., Fluctuating uplift and lining design in spillway stilling basins, J. Hydraul. Eng., 118, 4, pp. 578-597, (1992)
  • [10] Ghorbani M.A., Deo R.C., Yaseen Z.M.K., Mahasa H.K., Mohammad B., Pan evaporation prediction using a hybrid multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm (MLP-FFA) model: Case study in North Iran, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 133, pp. 1119-1131, (2017)