Breakdown of knowledge authority: semiotic analysis of an anti-vax conspiracy theory influencer on Twitter

被引:0
作者
Piva, Heidi Campana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Torino, Dept Philosophy & Educ Sci, Turin, Italy
关键词
political semiotics; discourse analysis; social media; disinformation; medical conspiracy theories; anti-vax;
D O I
10.1080/10350330.2024.2341398
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Anti-vax conspiracy theories are major drivers of "vaccine hesitancy", a top-10 threat to global health according to the WHO. This paper investigates the interpretative mechanisms and discursive conditions of anti-vax discourse on Twitter (X), through the analysis of seven tweets posted by an anti-vax influencer. Mixed methods of discourse analysis are employed, focusing on the strategic character and potential social effects of discourse. As a set of relations, the code-text of anti-vax conspiracy theories is characterized by a conflict between authority and freedom. The archetype of the enemy is diffuse and composed of different elements (government, mainstream media, medical/scientific community) that are all totalized into one-and-the-same evil: "the authorities." Overall, when facing the increasing deconstruction of epistemic authority on social media, the form (independently from content) with which anti-vax discourse seeks to provide argumentation (by framing identities and social relations in the shape of dichotomic oppositions) is fundamentally undesirable.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: A critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control
    Aujoulat, Isabelle
    Marcolongo, Renzo
    Bonadiman, Leopoldo
    Deccache, Alain
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (05) : 1228 - 1239
  • [2] Aupers S, 2020, CONSPIR THEOR, P469, DOI 10.4324/9780429452734-4_7
  • [3] Birchall Clare., 2006, KNOWLEDGE GOES POP C
  • [4] Blaskiewicz R., 2013, Medical Writing, V22, P259, DOI [DOI 10.1179/2047480613Z.000000000142, 10.1179/2047480613z.000000000142]
  • [5] The characteristics of rumor spreaders on Twitter: A quantitative analysis on real data
    Bodaghi, Amirhosein
    Oliveira, Jonice
    [J]. COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 160 : 674 - 687
  • [6] Butter M, 2020, CONSPIR THEOR, P28
  • [7] Camilo E., 2016, Lexia, V23, P141
  • [8] Caumanns U, 2020, CONSPIR THEOR, P441
  • [9] Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), 2020, The Disinformation Dozen: Why Platforms Must Act on Twelve Leading Online Anti-Vaxxers
  • [10] World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions
    Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
    Kaptoge, Stephen
    Pennells, Lisa
    De Bacquer, Dirk
    Cooney, Marie Therese
    Kavousi, Maryam
    Stevens, Gretchen
    Riley, Leanne
    Savin, Stefan
    Altay, Servet
    Amouyel, Philippe
    Assmann, Gerd
    Bell, Steven
    Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
    Berkman, Lisa
    Beulens, Joline W.
    Bjorkelund, Cecilia
    Blaha, Michael J.
    Blazer, Dan G.
    Bolton, Thomas
    Bonita, Ruth
    Brenner, Beaglehole Hermann
    Brunner, Eric J.
    Casiglia, Edoardo
    Chamnan, Parinya
    Choi, Yeun-Hyang
    Chowdhury, Rajiv
    Coady, Sean
    Crespo, Carlos J.
    Cushman, Mary
    Dagenais, Gilles R.
    D'Agostino, Ralph B.
    Daimon, Makoto
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Engstrom, Gunnar
    Fang, Xianghua
    Ford, Ian
    Gallacher, John
    Gansevoort, Ron T.
    Gaziano, Thomas Andrew
    Giampaoli, Simona
    Grandits, Greg
    Grimsgaard, Sameline
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Gudnason, Vilmundur
    Guo, Qi
    Humphries, Steve
    Iso, Hiroyasu
    Jukema, J. Wouter
    Kauhanen, Jussi
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 7 (10): : E1332 - E1345