A comprehensive evaluation of hydrological processes in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model

被引:1
作者
Zhou, Hao [1 ]
Tang, Jing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Olin, Stefan [1 ]
Miller, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Volatile Interact, Dept Biol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] VOLT Ctr Volatile Interact, Univ Pk 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
dynamic global vegetation model; evapotranspiration; hydrological processes evaluation; observation-based global gridded datasets; runoff; surface soil moisture; PART; 1; TERRESTRIAL BIOSPHERE; LAND; RUNOFF; CARBON; WATER; SCHEME; SATELLITE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.15152
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The global water and carbon cycles are greatly influenced by terrestrial vegetation, making trustworthy representations of dynamic biosphere-hydrosphere interactions a crucial component of both ecosystem and climate models. This paper comprehensively evaluates the hydrological performance of a leading dynamic global vegetation model Lund-Potsdam-Jena General Ecosystem Simulator (LPJ-GUESS), using a broad range of the latest available global observation-based gridded datasets that cover the main components of the hydrological cycle. Overall, we find that the hydrological components modelled by LPJ-GUESS agree well with global gridded datasets of runoff, evapotranspiration and surface soil moisture, though there are discrepancies in some regions and periods. Furthermore, LPJ-GUESS accurately captures both inter- and intra-annual variations of runoff in most regions and catchment areas, including the Danube, Murray, Yangtze, Yenisei and Nile basins. Total evapotranspiration modelled by LPJ-GUESS agrees closely with the evapotranspiration estimates of the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model and PML-V2 datasets, but with some disagreement in the individual components, especially for evaporation. The surface soil moisture simulated by LPJ-GUESS aligns with ESA-CCI (v5.3) surface soil moisture datasets in most regions, with greatest discrepancies in subarctic areas. We attribute these discrepancies to two main sources: (1) absent or poor representation of processes such as river routing, storage and supply of water bodies, and cropland irrigation; and (2) uncertainties in both reference datasets and input to the model, including precipitation, soil texture, and land use. The latest ecosystem model Lund-Potsdam-Jena General Ecosystem Simulator (LPJ-GUESS) can reproduce observed patterns of runoff, evapotranspiration, and soil surface moisture across a range of temporal and spatial scales. Evaluation of hydrological processes of LPJ-GUESS is critical for identifying important processes that should be developed to further and provides valuable insights for the improvement of this and other ecosystem models. image
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections
    Ahlstrom, A.
    Schurgers, G.
    Arneth, A.
    Smith, B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [2] Advances in understanding large-scale responses of the water cycle to climate change
    Allan, Richard P.
    Barlow, Mathew
    Byrne, Michael P.
    Cherchi, Annalisa
    Douville, Herve
    Fowler, Hayley J.
    Gan, Thian Y.
    Pendergrass, Angeline G.
    Rosenfeld, Daniel
    Swann, Abigail L. S.
    Wilcox, Laura J.
    Zolina, Olga
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2020, 1472 (01) : 49 - 75
  • [3] A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling
    Amatulli, Giuseppe
    Domisch, Sami
    Tuanmu, Mao-Ning
    Parmentier, Benoit
    Ranipeta, Ajay
    Malczyk, Jeremy
    Jetz, Walter
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
  • [4] Batjes NH., 2005, ISRIC-WISE global data set of derived soil properties on a 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid (Version 3.0
  • [5] Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
    Beck, Hylke E.
    Vergopolan, Noemi
    Pan, Ming
    Levizzani, Vincenzo
    van Dijk, Albert I. J. M.
    Weedon, Graham P.
    Brocca, Luca
    Pappenberger, Florian
    Huffman, George J.
    Wood, Eric F.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (12) : 6201 - 6217
  • [6] LPJ-GUESS/LSMv1.0: a next-generation land surface model with high ecological realism
    Belda, David Martin
    Anthoni, Peter
    Warlind, David
    Olin, Stefan
    Schurgers, Guy
    Tang, Jing
    Smith, Benjamin
    Arneth, Almut
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (17) : 6709 - 6745
  • [7] The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description - Part 1: Energy and water fluxes
    Best, M. J.
    Pryor, M.
    Clark, D. B.
    Rooney, G. G.
    Essery, R. L. H.
    Menard, C. B.
    Edwards, J. M.
    Hendry, M. A.
    Porson, A.
    Gedney, N.
    Mercado, L. M.
    Sitch, S.
    Blyth, E.
    Boucher, O.
    Cox, P. M.
    Grimmond, C. S. B.
    Harding, R. J.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 4 (03) : 677 - 699
  • [8] Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions
    Bierkens, Marc F. P.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (07) : 4923 - 4947
  • [9] A self-tuning ANN model for simulation and forecasting of surface flows
    Bozorg-Haddad, Omid
    Zarezadeh-Mehrizi, Mahboubeh
    Abdi-Dehkordi, Mehri
    Loaiciga, Hugo A.
    Marino, Miguel A.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (09) : 2907 - 2929
  • [10] Surface vegetation controls on evapotranspiration from a sub-humid Western Boreal Plain wetland
    Brown, S. M.
    Petrone, R. M.
    Mendoza, C.
    Devito, K. J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2010, 24 (08) : 1072 - 1085