(Why) did it turn wrong? Wholeness or totality of the Internet

被引:0
作者
Leskauskas D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychiatry, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Eiveniu str. 2, LT, Kaunas
关键词
adolescents; COVID; development; Internet; psychotherapy; totalitarian object;
D O I
10.1057/s11231-024-09448-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Internet was created as a space and a structure to share knowledge, information, and opinions for the sake of science and progression of humanity. Today, the Internet is co-created and modified by its users networking from all over the world. It is a representation of humankind, a social structure reactive to local and global societal processes. For the youngest generations the Internet is an integral part of their social milieu influencing both normal and pathological development from their very first year of life. Discussing the roots of totalitarianism, Erik H. Erikson distinguished between wholeness and totality in personal and social development and provided a wonderful metaphor of productive and pathogenic functioning for the impact of the Internet. Conceived as a fruitful association and organization for the development of wholeness in individuals and a future humanity, it largely keeps this promise. But under unfavorable social conditions and/or pathogenic individual predispositions, it can take a totalitarian structure and mode of action. © Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Bion W.R., A theory of thinking, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, pp. 306-310, (1962)
  • [2] Blos P., The second individuation process of adolescence, Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, pp. 162-186, (1967)
  • [3] Erikson E.H., On totalitarianism, Identity, youth and crisis, pp. 74-90, (1968)
  • [4] Heuves W., Young adolescents: Development and treatment, Emotional development in psychoanalysis, attachment theory and neuroscience: Creating connections, pp. 183-202, (2003)
  • [5] Leskauskas D., Generation Z – everyday (living with an) auxiliary ego, International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 29, 3, pp. 169-174, (2020)
  • [6] Pozzi Monzo M., Micotti S., ‘Making the best of a bad job’: A literature review on digital psychoanalytic psychotherapy with children, adolescents, and families at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic, Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 46, pp. 273-280, (2020)
  • [7] Reatto L.L., Werbart A., Oasi O., De Salve F., Ierardi E., Giordano M., Riva Crugnola C., Understanding psychoanalytic work online and back to the couch in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: An investigation among Italian psychoanalysts, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, (2023)
  • [8] Sebek M., The fate of the totalitarian object, International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 5, 4, pp. 289-294, (1996)
  • [9] Schmidt-Low-Beer C., Atria M., Davar E., Communism and the trauma of its collapse revisited, American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, pp. 394-415, (2015)
  • [10] Winnicott D.W., Home is Where We Start From, (1986)