Technology acceptance prediction of robo-advisors by machine learning

被引:5
作者
Chung, Doohee [1 ]
Jeong, Pilwon [2 ]
Kwon, Donghwan [2 ]
Han, Hyunsoo [3 ]
机构
[1] Handong Global Univ, Sch Global Entrepreneurship & Informat Commun Tech, Pohang Si, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Business & Technol Management, Daejeon Si, South Korea
[3] Handong Global Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Pohang Si, South Korea
来源
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS | 2023年 / 18卷
关键词
Technology acceptance; Machine learning; Robo-advisor; Artificial Intelligence; Fintech; UNIFIED THEORY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SELF-EFFICACY; LIMITATIONS; REGRESSION; ADOPTION; UTAUT; MODEL; METAANALYSIS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200197
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Whether a new technology can spread smoothly in the market heavily depends on the user's acceptance of the technology. A considerable number of studies have sought to predict user acceptance intention through numerous methods. Most rely on the researcher's design and thus cannot present an optimized model that truly meets the research question. This study aims to provide a machine learning approach to predict the user's technology acceptance intention within the framework of robo-advisors. The new approach implements a predictive model from multiple machine learning algorithms such as regression tree, random forest, gradient boosting, and artificial neural network, and then compares the model with the traditional regression analysis methodology. All machine learning algorithms showed superior prediction performance than linear regression. Specifically, gradient boosting showed the best performance and perceived pleasure showed the greatest importance. This research ultimately provides theoretical implication regarding the perspective of acceptance prediction methodology and practical implication about which factors are crucial to acceptance of robo-advisors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [21] Dwivedi YK, 2011, IFIP ADV INF COMM TE, V366, P155
  • [22] Are Bigger Data Sets Better for Machine Learning? Fusing Single-Point and Dual-Event Dose Response Data for Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Ekins, Sean
    Freundlich, Joel S.
    Reynolds, Robert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2014, 54 (07) : 2157 - 2165
  • [23] An integrated approach based on Gaussian noises-based data augmentation method and AdaBoost model to predict faecal coliforms in rivers with small dataset
    El Bilali, Ali
    Taleb, Abdeslam
    Bahlaoui, Moulay Abdellah
    Brouziyne, Youssef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 599 (599)
  • [24] El Naqa I, Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-18305-31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18305-31]
  • [25] Faubion B., 2016, Effect of automated advising platforms on the financial advising market
  • [26] Fishbein M., 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE
  • [27] Freund Y, 1999, MACHINE LEARNING, PROCEEDINGS, P124
  • [28] Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
    Friedman, JH
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) : 1189 - 1232
  • [29] Interaction between hotel service robots and humans: A hotel-specific Service Robot Acceptance Model (sRAM)
    Fuentes-Moraleda, Laura
    Diaz-Perez, Patricia
    Orea-Giner, Alicia
    Munoz-Mazon, Ana
    Villace-Molinero, Teresa
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 36
  • [30] Machine Learning for Social Science: An Agnostic Approach
    Grimmer, Justin
    Roberts, Margaret E.
    Stewart, Brandon M.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 24, 2021, 2021, 24 : 395 - 419